A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on US veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation

被引:59
作者
Leung, Joseph [2 ]
Mann, Surinder [2 ]
Siao-Salera, Rodelei
Ransibrahmanakul, Kanat [2 ]
Lim, Brian [3 ]
Canete, Wilhelmina
Samson, Laramie
Gutierrez, Rebeck
Leung, Felix W. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] VAGLAHS, Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Ctr, North Hills, CA 91343 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Riverside Med Ctr, Riverside, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, North Hills, CA USA
关键词
UNSEDATED COLONOSCOPY; SCREENING COLONOSCOPY; WARM WATER; TIME REQUIREMENTS; CO2; INSUFFLATION; AIR INSUFFLATION; PROPOFOL; ENDOSCOPY; INFUSION; MIDAZOLAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.020
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Sedation for colonoscopy discomfort imposes a recovery-time burden on patients. The water method permitted 52% of patients accepting on-demand sedation to complete colonoscopy without sedation. On-site and at-home recovery times were not reported. Objective: To confirm the beneficial effect of the water method and document the patient recovery-time burden. Design: Randomized, controlled trial, with single-blinded, intent-to-treat analysis. Setting: Veterans Affairs outpatient endoscopy unit. Patients: This study involved veterans accepting on-demand sedation for screening and surveillance colonoscopy. Intervention: Air versus water method for colonoscope insertion. Main Outcome Measurements: Proportion of patients completing colonoscopy without sedation, cecal intubation rate, medication requirement, maximum discomfort (0 = none, 10 = severe), procedure-related and patient-related outcomes. Results: One hundred veterans were randomized to the air (n = 50) or water (n = 50) method. The proportions of patients who could complete colonoscopy without sedation in the water group (78%) and the air group (54%) were significantly different (P = .011, Fisher exact test), but the cecal intubation rate was similar (100% in both groups). Secondary analysis (data as Mean [SD]) shows that the water method produced a reduction in medication requirement: fentanyl, 12.5 (26.8) mu g versus 24.0 (30.7) mu g; midazolam, 0.5 (1.1) mg versus 0.94 (1.20) mg; maximum discomfort, 2.3 (1.7) versus 4.9 (2.0); recovery time on site, 8.4 (6.8) versus 12.3 (9.4) minutes; and recovery time at home, 4.5 (9.2) versus 10.9 (14.0) hours (P = .049; P = .06; P = .0012; P = .0199; and P = .0048, respectively, t test). Limitations: Single Veterans Affairs site, predominantly male population, unblinded examiners. Conclusion: This randomized, controlled trial confirms the reported beneficial effects of the water method. The combination of the water method with on-demand sedation minimizes the patient recovery-time burden. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00920751.) (Gastrointest Enclose 201173:103-10.)
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Baumann UA, 1999, ENDOSCOPY, V31, P314
[2]   Warm Water or Oil-Assisted Colonoscopy: Toward Simpler Examinations? [J].
Brocchi, Emilio ;
Pezzilli, Raffaele ;
Tomassetti, Paola ;
Campana, Davide ;
Morselli-Labate, Antonio M. ;
Corinaldesi, Roberto .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (03) :581-587
[3]   Warm water irrigation for dealing with spasm during colonoscopy: simple, inexpensive, and effective [J].
Church, JM .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (05) :672-674
[4]  
Cohen LB, 2004, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V59, pAB127
[5]   The demise of air insufflation and the rise of the warm water infusion method [J].
Davila, Marta L. ;
Davila, Raquel E. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 70 (03) :511-514
[6]   Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy [J].
Denberg, TD ;
Melhado, TV ;
Coombes, JM ;
Beaty, BL ;
Berman, K ;
Byers, TE ;
Marcus, AC ;
Steiner, JF ;
Ahnen, DJ .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (11) :989-995
[7]   Socioeconomic and Racial Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Screening among Medicare Enrollees in 2000 to 2005 [J].
Doubeni, Chyke A. ;
Laiyemo, Adeyinka O. ;
Reed, George ;
Field, Terry S. ;
Fletchers, Robert H. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (08) :2170-2175
[8]  
FALCHUK ZM, 1984, NEW ENGL J MED, V310, P598
[9]   The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: a national Web survey [J].
Faulx, AL ;
Vela, S ;
Das, A ;
Cooper, G ;
Sivak, MV ;
Isenberg, G ;
Chak, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (01) :9-15
[10]   Comparison of colonoscopies performed under sedation with propofol or with midazolam or without sedation [J].
Gasparovic, S ;
Rustemovic, N ;
Opacic, M ;
Bates, M ;
Petrovecki, M .
ACTA MEDICA AUSTRIACA, 2003, 30 (01) :13-16