Clinicians and individuals with acquired brain injury perspectives about factors that influence mobility: creating a core set of mobility domains among individuals with acquired brain injury

被引:5
作者
Alhasani, Rehab [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Radman, Dennis [1 ,2 ]
Auger, Claudine [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Lamontagne, Anouk [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Ahmed, Sara [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Sch Phys & Occupat Therapy, 3655 Sir Williamosier, Montreal, PQ H3G 1Y6, Canada
[2] Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Rehabil Greater Montrea, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Sch Rehabil, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Inst Univ Sur Readaptat Deficience Phys Montreal, CIUSSS Ctr Sud de Ile de Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] CISSS Laval, Jewish Rehabil Hosp, Laval, PQ, Canada
[7] CIUSSS Ctr Ouest Iile Montreal, Constance Lethbridge Rehabil Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[8] McGill Univ, Ctr Outcome Res & Evaluat CORE, Clin Epidemiol, Hlth Ctr Res Inst, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Mobility; acquired brain injury; international classification of functioning; health and disability framework; focus group; assessment; OLDER-ADULTS; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; FOCUS GROUP; FOLLOW-UP; STROKE; LIFE; REHABILITATION; MILD; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1080/07853890.2021.2015539
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To identify factors which may influence mobility and could be considered during the evaluation of mobility in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) following qualitative focus groups with both clinicians and individuals with ABI, to assess their needs and preferences in order to individualize their care management plans. Methods Five focus groups were held, three with clinicians from 3 rehabilitation sites of CRIR (CRDM: n = 4; IURDPM: n = 3; JRH: n = 10) and two with individuals with ABI from one rehabilitation site (CRDM) (individuals with stroke: n = 5; individuals with TBI: n = 5). Focus group discussions were transcribed and analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic content approaches. Results Four themes were identified: considering mobility holistically and individual needs, preferences, and unique experiences; assessment and intervention guidelines; support network; and uncertainty about symptoms and recovery. Using the ten-rule International Classification, Functioning, Disability, and Health framework linking process, codes were categorized into Body Functions Activity and Participation, and Environmental Factors exploring the prominent domains that mostly identify factors influencing mobility. Conclusions Comprehensive measurement of mobility remains an ongoing challenge owing to multiple contributing factors, ranging from personal and psychosocial factors to the influence of a myriad of environmental and community considerations. Preparing individuals with ABI for community mobility can be substantially improved if healthcare professionals employ communicative tools to facilitate shared decision making with patients and to deliver patient-centred rehabilitation care.
引用
收藏
页码:2365 / 2379
页数:15
相关论文
共 71 条
[41]   Action observation training of community ambulation for improving walking ability of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled pilot trial [J].
Park, Hyun-Ju ;
Oh, Duck-Won ;
Choi, Jong-Duk ;
Kim, Jong-Man ;
Kim, Suhn-Yeop ;
Cha, Yong-Jun ;
Jeon, Su-Jin .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 31 (08) :1078-1086
[42]  
Patil M, 2017, J NEUROSCI RURAL PRA, V8, P357, DOI 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_53_17
[43]   Assessing mobility in older adults: The UAB Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment [J].
Peel, C ;
Baker, PS ;
Roth, DL ;
Brown, CJ ;
Bodner, EV ;
Allman, RM .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2005, 85 (10) :1008-1019
[44]   From recovery to regaining control of life - the perspectives of people with stroke, their carers and health professionals [J].
Pereira, Carla Mendes ;
Greenwood, Nan ;
Jones, Fiona .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (20) :2897-2908
[45]  
Petersen RL, 2017, PERCEPTIONS EXPECTAT
[46]   Functioning and disability in traumatic brain injury: the Italian patient perspective in developing ICF Core Sets [J].
Pistarini, Caterina ;
Aiachini, Beatrice ;
Coenen, Michaela ;
Pisoni, Camilla .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 33 (23-24) :2333-2345
[47]   What are the barriers and facilitators to goal-setting during rehabilitation for stroke and other acquired brain injuries? A systematic review and meta-synthesis [J].
Plant, Sarah E. ;
Tyson, Sarah F. ;
Kirk, Susan ;
Parsons, John .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2016, 30 (09) :921-930
[48]   Health-related quality of life after TBI: a systematic review of study design, instruments, measurement properties, and outcome [J].
Polinder, Suzanne ;
Haagsma, Juanita A. ;
van Klaveren, David ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
van Beeck, Ed F. .
POPULATION HEALTH METRICS, 2015, 13
[49]   Clinical measurement of walking balance in people post stroke: a systematic review [J].
Pollock, C. L. ;
Eng, J. J. ;
Garland, S. J. .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2011, 25 (08) :693-708
[50]   Longitudinal Follow-Up of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Outcome at Two, Five, and Ten Years Post-Injury [J].
Ponsford, Jennie L. ;
Downing, Marina G. ;
Olver, John ;
Ponsford, Michael ;
Acher, Rose ;
Carty, Meagan ;
Spitz, Gershon .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2014, 31 (01) :64-77