Differentiating Acute Rejection From Preeclampsia After Kidney Transplantation

被引:6
作者
Yin, Ophelia
Kallapur, Aneesh
Coscia, Lisa
Constantinescu, Serban
Moritz, Michael
Afshar, Yalda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
RENAL-FUNCTION; PREGNANCY; CLASSIFICATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004389
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics in pregnancy that differentiate preeclampsia from acute renal allograft rejection and to investigate the maternal, neonatal, and graft sequelae of these diagnoses. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-controlled registry study of data abstracted from Transplant Pregnancy Registry International deliveries between 1968 and 2019. All adult kidney transplant recipients with singleton pregnancies of at least 20 weeks of gestation were included. Acute rejection was biopsy proven and preeclampsia was diagnosed based on contemporary criteria. Variables were compared using chi(2), Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests as appropriate. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze preterm birth. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare graft loss over time. RESULTS: There were 26 pregnant women with biopsy-confirmed acute rejection who were matched by the year they conceived to 78 pregnant women with preeclampsia. Recipients with acute rejection had elevated peripartum serum creatinine levels (73% vs 14%, P<.001), with median intrapartum creatinine of 3.90 compared with 1.15 mg/dL (P<.001). Conversely, only patients with preeclampsia had a significant increase in proteinuria from baseline. Although there were no significant differences in maternal outcomes, graft loss within 2 years postpartum (42% vs 10%) and long-term graft loss (73% vs 35%) were significantly increased in recipients who experienced acute rejection (P<.001 for both). The frequency of delivery before 32 weeks of gestation was 53% with acute rejection and 20% with preeclampsia. After controlling for hypertension and immunosuppressant use, acute rejection was associated with higher frequency of delivery at less than 32 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio 4.04, 95% CI 1.10-15.2). CONCLUSION: In pregnancy, acute rejection is associated with higher creatinine levels, and preeclampsia is associated with increased proteinuria. Acute rejection in pregnancy carries a risk of prematurity and graft loss beyond that of preeclampsia for kidney transplant recipients. FUNDING SOURCE: The Transplant Pregnancy Registry International is supported in part by an educational grant from Veloxis Pharmaceuticals.
引用
收藏
页码:1023 / 1031
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reviewing the pathogenesis of antibody-mediated rejection and renal graft pathology after kidney transplantation
    Morozumi, Kunio
    Takeda, Asami
    Otsuka, Yasuhiro
    Horike, Keiji
    Gotoh, Norihiko
    Narumi, Shunji
    Watarai, Yoshihiko
    Kobayashi, Takaaki
    NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 21 : 4 - 8
  • [32] Pathologic Characteristics of Early or Late Acute Cellular Rejection and Outcome After Kidney Transplant
    Wu, Kaiyin
    Budde, Klemens
    Schmidt, Danilo
    Neumayer, Hans-Helmut
    Rudolph, Birgit
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 12 (04) : 314 - 322
  • [33] Basiliximab as therapy for acute rejection after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus cirrhosis
    Togashi, Junichi
    Sugawara, Yasuhiko
    Tamura, Sumihito
    Kaneko, Junichi
    Yamashiki, Noriyo
    Aoki, Taku
    Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    BIOSCIENCE TRENDS, 2011, 5 (02) : 57 - 60
  • [34] Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection by De Novo Anti-HLA-DPβ and -DPα Antibodies After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report
    Thammanichanond, D.
    Parapiboon, W.
    Mongkolsuk, T.
    Worawichawong, S.
    Tammakorn, C.
    Kitpoka, P.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (08) : 2548 - 2552
  • [35] CD28 gene polymorphisms and acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation
    Thude, Hansjoerg
    Tiede, Petra
    Sterneck, Martina
    Peine, Sven
    Nashan, Bjoern
    Koch, Martina
    HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 81 (12) : 675 - 678
  • [36] Donor-specific ELISPOT assay for predicting acute rejection and allograft function after kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Udomkarnjananun, Suwasin
    Kerr, Stephen J.
    Townamchai, Natavudh
    van Besouw, Nicole M.
    Hesselink, Dennis A.
    Baan, Carla C.
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 94 : 1 - 11
  • [37] Biological Characteristics and Predictive Model of Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) After Kidney Transplantation: Evidences of Multi-Omics Analysis
    Han, Qianguang
    Zhang, Xiang
    Ren, Xiaohan
    Hang, Zhou
    Yin, Yu
    Wang, Zijie
    Chen, Hao
    Sun, Li
    Tao, Jun
    Han, Zhijian
    Tan, Ruoyun
    Gu, Min
    Ju, Xiaobing
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [38] Acute Kidney Injury in Children with Kidney Transplantation
    Alkandari, Omar
    Nguyen, Lieuko
    Hebert, Diane
    Langlois, Valerie
    Jawa, Natasha A.
    Parekh, Rulan S.
    Robinson, Lisa A.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 13 (11): : 1721 - 1729
  • [39] Indicators of Treatment Responsiveness to Rituximab and Plasmapheresis in Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation
    Immenschuh, Stephan
    Zilian, Eva
    Daemmrich, Max E.
    Schwarz, Anke
    Gwinner, Wilfried
    Becker, Jan Ulrich
    Blume, Cornelia A.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 99 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [40] Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation Patients From Deceased Donors With Acute Kidney Injury
    Jung, C. W.
    Park, K. T.
    Kim, S. Y.
    Kim, S. J.
    Kim, M. G.
    Jo, S. K.
    Cho, W.
    Kim, H. K.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 45 (08) : 2941 - 2945