How to Verify a Quantum Computation

被引:33
作者
Broadbent, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
complexity theory; cryptography; interactive proofs; quantum computing; quantum interactive proofs; quantum cryptography; UNIVERSAL;
D O I
10.4086/toc.2018.v014a011
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We give a new theoretical solution to a leading-edge experimental challenge, namely to the verification of quantum computations in the regime of high computational complexity. Our results are given in the language of quantum interactive proof systems. Specifically, we show that any language in BQP has a quantum interactive proof system with a polynomial-time classical verifier (who can also prepare random single-qubit pure states), and a quantum polynomial-time prover. Here, soundness is unconditional-i. e., it holds even for computationally unbounded provers. Compared to prior work achieving similar results, our technique does not require the encoding of the input or of the computation; instead, we rely on encryption of the input (together with a method to perform computations on encrypted inputs), and show that the random choice between three types of input (defining a computational run, versus two types of test runs) suffices. Because the overhead is very low for each run (it is linear in the size of the circuit), this shows that verification could be achieved at minimal cost compared to performing the computation. As a proof technique, we use a reduction to an entanglement-based protocol; to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time this technique has been used in the context of verification of quantum computations, and it enables a relatively straightforward analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Riemannian geometry of quantum computation [J].
Brandt, Howard E. .
NONLINEAR ANALYSIS-THEORY METHODS & APPLICATIONS, 2009, 71 (12) :E474-E486
[32]   Determining acceptance possibility for a quantum computation is hard for the polynomial hierarchy [J].
Fenner, S ;
Green, F ;
Homer, S ;
Pruim, R .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1999, 455 (1991) :3953-3966
[33]   Randomized Oblivious Transfer for Secure Multiparty Computation in the Quantum Setting [J].
Costa, Bruno ;
Branco, Pedro ;
Goulao, Manuel ;
Lemus, Mariano ;
Mateus, Paulo .
ENTROPY, 2021, 23 (08)
[34]   Principle and Research Progress of Quantum Computation and Quantum Cryptography [J].
Wang Y. ;
Xu Q. .
Xu, Qiuliang (xql@sdu.edu.cn), 2015, Science Press (57) :2015-2026
[35]   Quantum Fibrations: Quantum Computation on an Arbitrary Topological Space [J].
Ikeda, Kazuki .
ACTA MATHEMATICA SINICA-ENGLISH SERIES, 2024, 40 (11) :2693-2718
[36]   QUANTUM COMPUTATION OF SCATTERING IN SCALAR QUANTUM FIELD THEORIES [J].
Jordan, Stephen P. ;
Lee, Keith S. M. ;
Preskill, John .
QUANTUM INFORMATION & COMPUTATION, 2014, 14 (11-12) :1014-1080
[37]   Quantum Circuits for Dynamic Runtime Assertions in Quantum Computation [J].
Liu, Ji ;
Byrd, Gregory T. ;
Zhou, Huiyang .
TWENTY-FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURAL SUPPORT FOR PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND OPERATING SYSTEMS (ASPLOS XXV), 2020, :1017-1030
[38]   Delegating Quantum Computation in the Quantum Random Oracle Model [J].
Zhang, Jiayu .
THEORY OF CRYPTOGRAPHY, TCC 2019, PT II, 2019, 11892 :30-60
[39]   Quantum Circuits for Dynamic Runtime Assertions in Quantum Computation [J].
Zhou, Huiyang ;
Byrd, Gregory T. .
IEEE COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE LETTERS, 2019, 18 (02) :111-114
[40]   Lattice-gas quantum computation [J].
Yepez, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 1998, 9 (08) :1587-1596