Regeneration of gingival tissue using in situ tissue engineering with collagen scaffold

被引:9
作者
Hatayama, Takahide [1 ]
Nakada, Akira [1 ]
Nakamura, Hiroki [1 ]
Mariko, Wakatsuki [1 ]
Tsujimoto, Gentarou [1 ]
Nakamura, Tatsuo [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Inst Frontier Med Sci, Dept Bioartificial Organs, Lab Organ & Tissue Reconstruct, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Inst Frontier Med Sci, Dept Regenerat Sci & Engn, Kyoto, Japan
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY | 2017年 / 124卷 / 04期
关键词
IONIC-STRENGTH; CROSS-LINKING; PH; MEMBRANES; VITRO;
D O I
10.1016/j.oooo.2017.05.471
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. The aim of the study was to evaluate 2 types of collagen scaffold for gingival regeneration. Study Design. Two types of collagen scaffolds, CS-pH7.4 and CS-pH3.0, were prepared by processing atelocollagen at pH 7.4 or 3.0, respectively, followed by dehydrothermal treatment. Gingival wounds with sizes of 4 x 6 mm (rectangle) or 6 mm diameter (circle) were made with buccal incisions in beagle dogs. The defective area was surgically covered with the CS-pH7.4, CS-pH3.0, or no scaffold (control). Gingival regeneration was assessed by monitoring the differences in the lengths of the epithelial and submucosal tissues at the wound site and the normal site. Histopathologic assessments were performed by 4 evaluators independently; statistical significance was evaluated by using the Wald test. Results. Significantly higher recovery of epithelial and submucosal tissues, which, in turn, resulted in recovery of gum thickness, was observed in gingival wounds treated with the CS-pH7.4 compared with that in the control. CS-pH3.0 treatment also resulted in higher gingival regeneration compared with the control; however, the effects were more pronounced in wounds treated with the CS-pH7.4. CS-pH7.4-treated wounds showed better gingival regeneration compared with the control and CS-pH3.0-treated wounds, even after adjusting for interevaluator differences using a linear mixed model. Conclusions. CS-pH7.4 is a promising scaffold for gingival tissue regeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Tissue engineering in dentistry
    Abou Neel, Ensanya Ali
    Chrzanowski, Wojciech
    Salih, Vehid M.
    Kim, Hae-Won
    Knowles, Jonathan C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2014, 42 (08) : 915 - 928
  • [2] Tailoring Mechanical Properties of Collagen-Based Scaffolds for Vascular Tissue Engineering: The Effects of pH, Temperature and Ionic Strength on Gelation
    Achilli, Matteo
    Mantovani, Diego
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2010, 2 (04): : 664 - 680
  • [3] Cell Population Kinetics of Collagen Scaffolds in Ex Vivo Oral Wound Repair
    Agis, Hermann
    Collins, Amy
    Taut, Andrei D.
    Jin, Qiming
    Kruger, Laura
    Goerlach, Christoph
    Giannobile, William V.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [4] Brady TWest., 2014, Linear mixed models: a practical guide using statistical software
  • [5] Collagen membranes: A review
    Bunyaratavej, P
    Wang, HL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (02) : 215 - 229
  • [6] Gingival recession treatment using a bilayer collagen membrane
    Burns, WT
    Peacock, ME
    Cuenin, MF
    Hokett, SD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 71 (08) : 1348 - 1352
  • [7] Effects of bFGF on suppression of collagen type I accumulation and scar tissue formation during wound healing after mucoperiosteal denudation of rat palate
    Choi, Wookjin
    Kawanabe, Hitoshi
    Sawa, Yoshihiko
    Taniguchi, Kunihisa
    Ishikawa, Hiroyuki
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 66 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [8] Cnaan A, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P2349, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971030)16:20<2349::AID-SIM667>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-E
  • [10] Esposito M, 2012, EUR J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V5, P221