The Power of Attention: Using Eye Gaze to Predict Other-Regarding and Moral Choices

被引:66
作者
Ghaffari, Minou [1 ,2 ]
Fiedler, Susann [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Res Collect Goods, Gielen Leyendecker Res Grp, Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Psychol, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
bottom up; top down; eye tracking; social preferences; moral decision making; open data; open materials; preregistered; SOCIAL VALUE ORIENTATION; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; PERSONALITY; COOPERATION; DECISIONS; DILEMMAS; DYNAMICS; VALUES; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0956797618799301
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
According to research studying the processes underlying decisions, a two-channel mechanism connects attention and choices: top-down and bottom-up processes. To identify the magnitude of each channel, we exogenously varied information intake by systematically interrupting participants' decision processes in Study 1 (N = 116). Results showed that participants were more likely to choose a predetermined target option. Because selection effects limited the interpretation of the results, we used a sequential-presentation paradigm in Study 2 (preregistered, N = 100). To partial out bottom-up effects of attention on choices, in particular, we presented alternatives by mirroring the gaze patterns of autonomous decision makers. Results revealed that final fixations successfully predicted choices when experimentally manipulated (bottom up). Specifically, up to 11.32% of the link between attention and choices is driven by exogenously guided attention (1.19% change in choices overall), while the remaining variance is explained by top-down preference formation.
引用
收藏
页码:1878 / 1889
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   THE RING MEASURE OF SOCIAL VALUES - COMPUTERIZED PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN INFORMATION-PROCESSING AND SOCIAL VALUE ORIENTATION [J].
LIEBRAND, WBG ;
MCCLINTOCK, CG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1988, 2 (03) :217-230
[22]   Order in Choice: Effects of Serial Position on Preferences [J].
Mantonakis, Antonia ;
Rodero, Pauline ;
Lesschaeve, Isabelle ;
Hastie, Reid .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (11) :1309-1312
[23]   Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice [J].
Milosavljevic, Milica ;
Navalpakkam, Vidhya ;
Koch, Christof ;
Rangel, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) :67-74
[24]  
Neurobehavioral Systems, 2018, PRES COMP SOFTW
[25]   Perceptual But Not Complex Moral Judgments Can Be Biased by Exploiting the Dynamics of Eye-Gaze [J].
Newell, Ben R. ;
Le Pelley, Mike E. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2018, 147 (03) :409-417
[26]   Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making [J].
Orquin, Jacob L. ;
Loose, Simone Mueller .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 144 (01) :190-206
[27]   Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze [J].
Parnamets, Philip ;
Johansson, Petter ;
Hall, Lars ;
Balkenius, Christian ;
Spivey, Michael J. ;
Richardson, Daniel C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (13) :4170-4175
[28]  
Penner L.A., 1995, ADV PERSONALITY ASSE, V10, P147, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315806228
[29]  
RUSHTON JP, 1981, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V2, P293
[30]   Do Decisions Shape Preference? Evidence From Blind Choice [J].
Sharot, Tali ;
Velasquez, Cristina M. ;
Dolan, Raymond J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (09) :1231-1235