Influence of row spacing on water use and yield of rain-fed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a no-till system with stubble retention

被引:11
作者
Kleemann, S. G. L. [1 ]
Gill, G. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Agr Food & Wine, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
关键词
RED WINTER-WHEAT; SEEDING RATE; SPRING WHEAT; GRAIN-YIELD; MANAGEMENT; NITROGEN; ENVIRONMENT; GROWTH; FALLOW; BARLEY;
D O I
10.1071/CP10124
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
A 3-year field study was undertaken to investigate the effect of row spacing on vegetative growth, grain yield and water-use efficiency of wheat. All 3 years of the study experienced 21-51% below-average rainfall for the growing season. Widening row spacing led to reduced biomass and tillers on per plant basis which could be related to the reduction in light interception by the wheat canopy in the wide rows which in turn could have reduced assimilate production. Reduction in vegetative growth in 54-cm rows translated into a significant reduction in grain yield which was strongly associated (r(2) = 0.71) with the loss of spike density. The pattern of crop water use (evapotranspiration, ET) during the growing season was very similar for the three row-spacing treatments. However, there was some evidence for slightly lower ET (similar to 5%) in 54-cm rows in two growing seasons. More importantly, there was no evidence for increased ET during the post-anthesis phase in wide rows as has been speculated by some researchers. Over the 3 years of the study, grain yield declined by 5-8% as row spacing increased from 18 to 36 cm and by a further 12-20% as row spacing increased from 36 to 54 cm. There was a consistent decline in water-use efficiency for grain (WUE(G)) with increasing row spacing over the 3 years. WUE(G) declined by 6-11% as crop spacing increased from 18 to 36 cm and declined further by 12-15% as row spacing increased to 54 cm. Lower light interception at wider row spacing could have reduced assimilate production by wheat as well as increased soil evaporation due to lower shading of the soil surface in more open canopies. Growers adopting wider row spacing on these relatively heavy textured soils are likely to experience some reduction in grain yield and WUE(G). However, some growers may be prepared to accept a small yield penalty from intermediate row spacing as a trade-off for increased stubble retention and soil health.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 898
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Managing yield reductions from wide row spacing in wheat [J].
Amjad, M. ;
Anderson, W. K. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2006, 46 (10) :1313-1321
[2]  
AULD GF, 1983, AUSTR J AGR RES, V34, P99, DOI DOI 10.1071/AR9830099
[3]  
BELFORD RK, 1992, 51 W AUSTR DEP AGR
[4]  
BURCH RN, 1986, EFFECTS CHANGING ROW
[5]  
BURK L, 2008, GRDC PUBLICATION EST, P7
[6]   Hard red spring wheat response to row spacing, seeding rate, and nitrogen [J].
Chen, Chengci ;
Neill, Karnes ;
Wichman, Dave ;
Westcott, Malvern .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2008, 100 (05) :1296-1302
[7]   DRY-MATTER ACCUMULATION AND WATER-USE RELATIONSHIPS IN WHEAT CROPS [J].
DOYLE, AD ;
FISCHER, RA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1979, 30 (05) :815-829
[8]   Crop row spacing and its influence on the partitioning of evapotranspiration by winter-grown wheat in northern Syria [J].
Eberbach, P ;
Pala, M .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2005, 268 (1-2) :195-208
[9]  
Felton W. L., 1996, Proceedings of the 8th Australian Agronomy Conference, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia, 30 January-2 February, 1996., P251
[10]  
Felton W. L., 2004, P 14 AUSTR WEED C WE, P304