Facework in Syria and the United States: A cross-cultural comparison

被引:11
作者
Merkin, Rebecca [1 ]
Ramadan, Reem [2 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Bernard M Baruch Coll, New York, NY 10010 USA
[2] Damascus Univ, Dept Management, Damascus, Syria
关键词
Face and facework; Collectivism; Power distance; Masculinity; Uncertainty avoidance; Cross-cultural communication; Syrian communication; Value survey module; VSM; 94; NATIONAL CULTURE; CONFLICT; VALUES; CONSEQUENCES; MOTIVATION; AMERICAN; BEHAVIOR; STYLES; JAPAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.05.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
"The first rule when communicating with people from the Arab world is not to let them lose face" saidi. J. Al-Omari. Face or one's social identity is cultural. A face threat is a situation which threatens to create a loss of face. When experiencing face-threats people guard their face with facework - behavioral actions enacted to protect one's face. Since facework varies across cultures, this study analyzed how cultural collectivism, power distance, masculinity, and uncertainty avoidance influence direct, indirect, competitive, cooperative, hostile, and ritualistic facework in Syria and the United States, employing a MANCOVA design with gender as the covariate. Significant findings (n=336) showed that: (a) US Americans reported using more direct, competitive, and hostile facework strategies than Syrians while (b)Syrians reported using more indirect, cooperative and ritualistic facework strategies than US Americans (c) US American facework strategies corresponded to individualistic, weak power distance, masculine, and low uncertainty avoidance cultural dimensions while Syrian facework corresponded to collectivistic, high-power distance, moderately masculine, and high uncertainty avoidance and (d) VSM 94 results showed Syria to be more individualistic than Hofstede's original rankings. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 669
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[11]   FACEWORK IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED-STATES [J].
COCROFT, BAK ;
TINGTOOMEY, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS, 1994, 18 (04) :469-506
[12]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[13]  
De Mooij M., 1998, MASCULINITYFEMINITY, P55
[14]  
FETCHENHAUER D, 2005, SOCIAL JUSTICE RES, V18, P25, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11211-005-3369-1
[15]  
FRY E, 1991, BUSINESS CREDIT, V93, P26
[16]  
FURNHAM A, 1993, J SOC PSYCHOL, V133, P317, DOI 10.1080/00224545.1993.9712149
[17]   Don't take my word for it - Understanding Chinese speaking practices [J].
Gao, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS, 1998, 22 (02) :163-186
[18]  
GHATTAS SF, 2009, EYE ALLY IRANS TURMO
[19]   On Face-Work An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction [J].
Goffman, Erving .
PSYCHIATRY, 1955, 18 (03) :213-231
[20]  
Goffman Erving., 1967, INTERACTION RITUAL E