Facework in Syria and the United States: A cross-cultural comparison

被引:11
作者
Merkin, Rebecca [1 ]
Ramadan, Reem [2 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Bernard M Baruch Coll, New York, NY 10010 USA
[2] Damascus Univ, Dept Management, Damascus, Syria
关键词
Face and facework; Collectivism; Power distance; Masculinity; Uncertainty avoidance; Cross-cultural communication; Syrian communication; Value survey module; VSM; 94; NATIONAL CULTURE; CONFLICT; VALUES; CONSEQUENCES; MOTIVATION; AMERICAN; BEHAVIOR; STYLES; JAPAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.05.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
"The first rule when communicating with people from the Arab world is not to let them lose face" saidi. J. Al-Omari. Face or one's social identity is cultural. A face threat is a situation which threatens to create a loss of face. When experiencing face-threats people guard their face with facework - behavioral actions enacted to protect one's face. Since facework varies across cultures, this study analyzed how cultural collectivism, power distance, masculinity, and uncertainty avoidance influence direct, indirect, competitive, cooperative, hostile, and ritualistic facework in Syria and the United States, employing a MANCOVA design with gender as the covariate. Significant findings (n=336) showed that: (a) US Americans reported using more direct, competitive, and hostile facework strategies than Syrians while (b)Syrians reported using more indirect, cooperative and ritualistic facework strategies than US Americans (c) US American facework strategies corresponded to individualistic, weak power distance, masculine, and low uncertainty avoidance cultural dimensions while Syrian facework corresponded to collectivistic, high-power distance, moderately masculine, and high uncertainty avoidance and (d) VSM 94 results showed Syria to be more individualistic than Hofstede's original rankings. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 669
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Al-Omari J., 2008, Understanding the Arab Culture, V2nd, DOI 10.1016/B978-1-4160-5354-3.50015-5
  • [2] The psychology of globalization
    Arnett, JJ
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2002, 57 (10) : 774 - 783
  • [3] Masculinity-femininity as a national characteristic and its relationship with national agoraphobic fear levels:: Fodor's sex role hypothesis revitalized
    Arrindell, WA
    Eisemann, M
    Richter, J
    Oei, TPS
    Caballo, VE
    van der Ende, J
    Sanavio, E
    Bagés, N
    Feldman, L
    Torres, B
    Sica, C
    Iwawaki, S
    Hatzichristou, C
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2003, 41 (07) : 795 - 807
  • [4] Hofstede never studied culture
    Baskerville, RF
    [J]. ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2003, 28 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [5] Brislin RW., 1986, The wording and translation of research instruments, P137, DOI DOI 10.1177/017084068800900318
  • [6] Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice
    Brockner, J
    Ackerman, G
    Greenberg, J
    Gelfand, MJ
    Francesco, AM
    Chen, ZX
    Leung, K
    Bierbrauer, G
    Gomez, C
    Kirkman, BL
    Shapiro, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 37 (04) : 300 - 315
  • [7] Slipperiness, Evasion, and Ambiguity Equivocation and Facework in Noncommittal Political Discourse
    Bull, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 27 (04) : 333 - 344
  • [8] AN INVENTORY FOR ASSESSING DIFFERENT KINDS OF HOSTILITY
    BUSS, AH
    DURKEE, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1957, 21 (04): : 343 - 349
  • [9] Chang H., 1994, CHALLENGE FACEWORK, P95
  • [10] Cocroft B. K., 1992, THESIS CALIFORNIA ST