Comparison of Typical Controllers for Direct Yaw Moment Control Applied on an Electric Race Car

被引:18
作者
Medina, Andoni [1 ]
Bistue, Guillermo [1 ]
Rubio, Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, Engn Sch TECNUN, Paseo Manuel Lardizabal 13, Donostia San Sebastian 20018, Spain
关键词
direct yaw moment control; electric race car; FSAE; limit handling; yaw rate control; lap time simulation; MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; TORQUE-VECTORING CONTROL; STABILITY CONTROL; CONTROL-SYSTEM; VEHICLE; DYNAMICS; SIDESLIP; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/vehicles3010008
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Direct Yaw Moment Control (DYC) is an effective way to alter the behaviour of electric cars with independent drives. Controlling the torque applied to each wheel can improve the handling performance of a vehicle making it safer and faster on a race track. The state-of-the-art literature covers the comparison of various controllers (PID, LPV, LQR, SMC, etc.) using ISO manoeuvres. However, a more advanced comparison of the important characteristics of the controllers' performance is lacking, such as the robustness of the controllers under changes in the vehicle model, steering behaviour, use of the friction circle, and, ultimately, lap time on a track. In this study, we have compared the controllers according to some of the aforementioned parameters on a modelled race car. Interestingly, best lap times are not provided by perfect neutral or close-to-neutral behaviour of the vehicle, but rather by allowing certain deviations from the target yaw rate. In addition, a modified Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller showed that its performance is comparable to other more complex control techniques such as Model Predictive Control (MPC).
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 144
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SAE Technical Paper 950759
[2]   Testing of a torque vectoring controller for a Formula Student prototype [J].
Antunes, Joao ;
Antunes, Andre ;
Outeiro, Pedro ;
Cardeira, Carlos ;
Oliveira, Paulo .
ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2019, 113 :56-62
[3]   Vehicle yaw control using a fast NMPC approach [J].
Canale, M. ;
Fagiano, L. .
47TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, 2008 (CDC 2008), 2008, :5360-5365
[4]   Comparing Internal Model Control and Sliding-Mode Approaches for Vehicle Yaw Control [J].
Canale, Massimo ;
Fagiano, Lorenzo ;
Ferrara, Antonella ;
Vecchio, Claudio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2009, 10 (01) :31-41
[5]  
Carvalho Pinheiro Henrique, 2019, Advances in Mechanism and Machine Science. Proceedings of the 15th IFToMM World Congress on Mechanism and Machine Science. Mechanisms and Machine Science (MMS 73), P3127, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-20131-9_308
[6]   Dynamic Handling Characteristics Control of an in-Wheel-Motor Driven Electric Vehicle Based on Multiple Sliding Mode Control Approach [J].
Chae, Minseong ;
Hyun, Youngjin ;
Yi, Kyongsu ;
Nam, Kanghyun .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :132448-132458
[7]   The impact of hybrid and electric powertrains on vehicle dynamics, control systems and energy regeneration [J].
Crolla, David A. ;
Cao, Dongpu .
VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2012, 50 :95-109
[8]   Direct yaw moment control actuated through electric drivetrains and friction brakes: Theoretical design and experimental assessment [J].
De Novellis, Leonardo ;
Sorniotti, Aldo ;
Gruber, Patrick ;
Orus, Javier ;
Rodriguez Fortun, Jose-Manuel ;
Theunissen, Johan ;
De Smet, Jasper .
MECHATRONICS, 2015, 26 :1-15
[9]   Comparison of Feedback Control Techniques for Torque-Vectoring Control of Fully Electric Vehicles [J].
De Novellis, Leonardo ;
Sorniotti, Aldo ;
Gruber, Patrick ;
Pennycott, Andrew .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 63 (08) :3612-3623
[10]   Wheel Torque Distribution Criteria for Electric Vehicles With Torque-Vectoring Differentials [J].
De Novellis, Leonardo ;
Sorniotti, Aldo ;
Gruber, Patrick .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 63 (04) :1593-1602