Relationship Between Coronary Contrast-Flow Quantitative Flow Ratio and Myocardial Ischemia Assessed by SPECT MPI

被引:27
作者
Smit, Jeff M. [1 ]
Koning, Gerhard [2 ]
van Rosendael, Alexander R. [1 ]
Dibbets-Schneider, Petra [3 ]
Mertens, Bart J. [4 ]
Jukema, J. Wouter [1 ]
Delgado, Victoria [1 ]
Reiber, Johan H. C. [2 ,5 ]
Bax, Jeroen J. [1 ]
Scholte, Arthur J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Medis Med Imaging Syst BV, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Computational fluid dynamics; Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve; Non-invasive imaging; Quantitative coronary angiography; PERFUSION SPECT; RESERVE; ANGIOGRAPHY; INTERVENTION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-017-3769-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose A new method has been developed to calculate fractional flow reserve (FFR) from invasive coronary angiography, the so-called "contrast-flow quantitative flow ratio (cQFR)". Recently, cQFR was compared to invasive FFR in intermediate coronary lesions showing an overall diagnostic accuracy of 85%. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between cQFR and myocardial ischemia assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI). Methods Patients who underwent SPECT MPI and coronary angiography within 3 months were included. The cQFR computation was performed offline, using dedicated software. The cQFR computation was based on 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and computational fluid dynamics. The standard 17-segment model was used to determine the vascular territories. Myocardial ischemia was defined as a summed difference score >= 2 in a vascular territory. A cQFR of <= 0.80 was considered abnormal. Results Two hundred and twenty-four coronary arteries were analysed in 85 patients. Overall accuracy of cQFR to detectischemia on SPECT MPI was 90%. In multivariable analysis, cQFR was independently associated with ischemia on SPECT MPI (OR per 0.01 decrease of cQFR: 1.10; 95% CI 1.04-1.18, p = 0.002), whereas clinical and QCA parameters were not. Furthermore, cQFR showed incremental value for the detection of ischemia compared to clinical and QCA parameters (global chi square 48.7 to 62.6; p < 0.001). Conclusions A good relationship between cQFR and SPECT MPI was found. cQFR was independently associated with ischemia on SPECT MPI and showed incremental value to detect ischemia compared to clinical and QCA parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:1888 / 1896
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Medical progress - Coronary microvascular dysfunction [J].
Camici, Paolo G. ;
Crea, Filippo .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (08) :830-840
[2]   Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart - A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association [J].
Cerqueira, MD ;
Weissman, NJ ;
Dilsizian, V ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Kaul, S ;
Laskey, WK ;
Pennell, DJ ;
Rumberger, JA ;
Ryan, T ;
Verani, MS .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (04) :539-542
[3]   Contemporary Patterns of Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Use Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry [J].
Dattilo, Philip B. ;
Prasad, Anand ;
Honeycutt, Emily ;
Wang, Tracy Y. ;
Messenger, John C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (22) :2337-2339
[4]   Invasive imaging - Fractional flow reserve: a review [J].
De Bruyne, B. ;
Sarma, J. .
HEART, 2008, 94 (07) :949-959
[5]  
Germano G, 2000, J NUCL MED, V41, P712
[6]   Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Angiographic Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease [J].
Melikian, Narbeh ;
De Bondt, Pieter ;
Tonino, Pim ;
De Winter, Olivier ;
Wyffels, Eric ;
Bartunek, Jozef ;
Heyndrickx, Guy R. ;
Fearon, William F. ;
Pijls, Nico H. J. ;
Wijns, William ;
De Bruyne, Bernard .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (03) :307-314
[7]   2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease [J].
Montalescot, Gilles ;
Sechtem, Udo ;
Achenbach, Stephan ;
Andreotti, Felicita ;
Budaj, Andrzej ;
Bugiardini, Raffaele ;
Crea, Filippo ;
Cuisset, Thomas ;
Di Mario, Carlo ;
Rafael Ferreira, J. ;
Gersh, Bernard J. ;
Gitt, Anselm K. ;
Hulot, Jean-Sebastien ;
Marx, Nikolaus ;
Opie, Lionel H. ;
Pfisterer, Matthias ;
Prescott, Eva ;
Ruschitzka, Frank ;
Sabate, Manel ;
Senior, Roxy ;
Taggart, David Paul ;
van der Wall, Ernst E. ;
Vrints, Christiaan J. M. ;
Knuuti, Juhani ;
Valgimigli, Marco ;
Bueno, Hector ;
Claeys, Marc J. ;
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert ;
Erol, Cetin ;
Frank, Herbert ;
Funck-Brentano, Christian ;
Gaemperli, Oliver ;
Gonzalez-Juanatey, Jose R. ;
Hamilos, Michalis ;
Hasdai, David ;
Husted, Steen ;
James, Stefan K. ;
Kervinen, Kari ;
Kolh, Philippe ;
Kristensen, Steen Dalby ;
Lancellotti, Patrizio ;
Maggioni, Aldo Pietro ;
Piepoli, Massimo F. ;
Pries, Axel R. ;
Romeo, Francesco ;
Ryden, Lars ;
Simoons, Maarten L. ;
Sirnes, Per Anton ;
Steg, Ph. Gabriel ;
Timmis, Adam .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (38) :2949-+
[8]   Functional assessment of coronary stenoses: can we live without it? [J].
Pijls, Nico H. J. ;
Tanaka, Nobuhiro ;
Fearon, William F. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (18) :1335-1344
[9]   Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study [J].
Pijls, Nico H. J. ;
Fearon, William F. ;
Tonino, Pim A. L. ;
Siebert, Uwe ;
Ikeno, Fumiaki ;
Bornschein, Bernhard ;
van't Veer, Marcel ;
Klauss, Volker ;
Manoharan, Ganesh ;
Engstrom, Thomas ;
Oldroyd, Keith G. ;
Lee, Peter N. Ver ;
MacCarthy, Philip A. ;
De Bruyne, Bernard .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (03) :177-184