DNA mismatch repair enzyme immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer: a comparison of biopsy and resection material

被引:48
作者
Kumarasinghe, Anuttara Panchali [1 ]
de Boer, Bastiaan [3 ]
Bateman, Adrian C. [2 ]
Kumarasinghe, Marian Priyanthi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[2] Southampton Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Cellular Pathol, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] QEII Med Ctr, PathW Labs, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Colorectal cancer; microsatellite instability; mismatch repair proteins; immunohistochemistry; MICROSATELLITE-INSTABILITY STATUS; COLON-CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; PROTEINS; CARCINOMAS; DIAGNOSIS; CARRIERS; MLH1; MSH2; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3109/00313025.2010.493862
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) may be predicted using mismatch repair protein (MMRP) immunohistochemistry (immunostaining), allowing focused genetic investigations and potentially influencing therapeutic interventions. Most laboratories perform immunostaining on surgical resection specimens. Endoscopic biopsy specimens are an alternative tissue source for immunostaining. Given the sensitivity of immunostaining to the degree of tissue fixation, endoscopic biopsy material may produce superior staining, based on faster and more thorough fixation. Moreover, in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, endoscopic biopsies may be more useful than surgical resection specimens by allowing assessment of MMR status prior to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy induced changes in tumours. This study examines whether immunostaining for MMRP expression in CRC is as reliable on endoscopic biopsy material as on surgical resection specimens. Methods: Immunostaining for MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MHS6 was performed on 112 unselected CRC cases with both endoscopic biopsy and surgical resection material available. A single observer blindly examined intensity and distribution of staining and assessed MMRP expression. Two consultant histopathologists reviewed challenging cases. Endoscopic biopsies and surgical resections were compared using non-parametric statistical analysis. Results: Immunostaining for all four MMRPs on all 112 cases produced conclusive (i.e., fully interpretable) results in endoscopic biopsies. In surgical resection specimens, 10 stains from nine cases were inconclusive (stains for two MMRPs were inconclusive in one case). In cases where conclusive immunostaining was achieved, there was complete agreement in MMRP status between the endoscopic biopsy and corresponding surgical resection specimens. Overall, MMRP loss was identified in 13% of cases; 11% MLH1, 12% PMS2, 1% MSH2, and 1% MSH6. Immunostaining intensity was significantly higher (p<0.0005) and the distribution of staining was significantly more uniform (p<0.0005) on endoscopic biopsy than on surgical resection. Conclusion: Endoscopic biopsy provides equal accuracy and easier interpretation of MMRP expression immunostaining compared to surgical resection specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 420
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Consequences of testing for mismatch repair deficiency of colorectal cancer in clinical practice
    Leicher, L. W.
    Lammertink, M. H. A.
    Offerman, S. R.
    Morreau, H.
    de Jong, M. M.
    de Groot, J. W. B.
    van Westreenen, H. L.
    Vasen, H. F. A.
    Cappel, W. H. de Vos Tot Nederveen
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 53 (05) : 632 - 636
  • [32] Clinical actionability of triaging DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer from biopsy samples using deep learning
    Jiang, Wu
    Mei, Wei-Jian
    Xu, Shuo-Yu
    Ling, Yi-Hong
    Li, Wei-Rong
    Kuang, Jin-Bo
    Li, Hao-Sen
    Hui, Hui
    Li, Ji-Bin
    Cai, Mu-Yan
    Pan, Zhi-Zhong
    Zhang, Hui-Zhong
    Li, Li
    Ding, Pei-Rong
    EBIOMEDICINE, 2022, 81
  • [33] Colorectal Cancer Due to Deficiency in DNA Mismatch Repair Function A Review
    Bellizzi, Andrew M.
    Frankel, Wendy L.
    ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2009, 16 (06) : 405 - 417
  • [34] Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Endometrial Cancer: Immunohistochemistry Staining and Clinical Implications
    Doghri, Raoudha
    Houcine, Yoldez
    Boujelbene, Nadia
    Driss, Maha
    Charfi, Lamia
    Abbes, Imene
    Mrad, Karima
    Sellami, Rini
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2019, 27 (09) : 678 - 682
  • [35] Prevalence of Alterations in DNA Mismatch Repair Genes in Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer
    Limburg, Paul J.
    Harmsen, William S.
    Chen, Helen H.
    Gallinger, Steven
    Haile, Robert W.
    Baron, John A.
    Casey, Graham
    Woods, Michael O.
    Thibodeau, Stephen N.
    Lindor, Noralane M.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 9 (06) : 497 - 502
  • [36] DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency Detection in Colorectal Cancer by a New Microsatellite Instability Analysis System
    Wu, Shafei
    Liu, Xiaoding
    Wang, Jing
    Zhou, Weixun
    Guan, Mei
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Pang, Junyi
    Lu, Tao
    Zhou, Liangrui
    Shi, Xiaohua
    Wu, Huanwen
    Liang, Zhiyong
    Zeng, Xuan
    INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-COMPUTATIONAL LIFE SCIENCES, 2020, 12 (02) : 145 - 154
  • [37] Patterns of DNA mismatch repair protein expression for primary and recurrent colorectal cancer at an advanced surgical unit: A retrospective audit
    Risbey, Charles
    Fielder, Timothy
    Steffens, Daniel
    Shin, Joo-Shik
    Solomon, Michael
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (03) : 369 - 374
  • [38] Heterogenous mismatch-repair status in colorectal cancer
    Joost, Patrick
    Veurink, Nynke
    Holck, Susanne
    Klarskov, Louise
    Bojesen, Anders
    Harbo, Maria
    Baldetorp, Bo
    Rambech, Eva
    Nilbert, Mef
    DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [39] Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer: therapeutic advances and questions
    Cervantes, Baptiste
    Andre, Thierry
    Cohen, Romain
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 16
  • [40] Mismatch repair deficiency concordance between primary colorectal cancer and corresponding metastasis
    Haraldsdottir, Sigurdis
    Roth, Rachel
    Pearlman, Rachel
    Hampel, Heather
    Arnold, Christina A.
    Frankel, Wendy L.
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (02) : 253 - 260