Using social media to assess recreation across urban green spaces in times of abrupt change

被引:51
作者
Grzyb, Tomasz [1 ]
Kulczyk, Sylwia [1 ]
Derek, Marta [1 ]
Wozniak, Edyta [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Geog & Reg Studies, Krakowskie Przedmiescie 30, PL-00927 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Space Res Ctr, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; Recreation; Urban parks and forests; Urban wilderness continuum; Instagram; Hashtags; CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION; LANDSCAPE VALUES; PARKS; HEALTH; PREFERENCES; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCE; CHALLENGES; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101297
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
For most of the world's population, urban green spaces (UGS) offer the easiest form of contact with nature. Such environments deliver a wide variety of Recreational Ecosystem Services (RES) to visitors. This paper explores RES delivery in different types of UGS, differentiated with respect to their naturalness and distance from the city centre. Furthermore, it investigates how the identified use patterns are affected by an abrupt change in access. We extract data from Instagram, posted at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, for Warsaw, Poland, and use it to measure both the intensity of use of UGS, and the experience of Instagram users. Furthermore, we compare these data with data from the same period for the previous year (2019). Our results indicate that, in typical conditions, the wilder the area, the fewer visitors. RES patterns changed, however, when access to UGS was restricted. The recent COVID-19 outbreak showed that soon after restrictions on visiting UGS were lifted, recreation shifted towards wilder green areas. Moreover, users became more oriented to wild nature. We conclude that the number of visitors, and the pattern of recreational use of UGS, are highly dependent on the character of green spaces across the urban wilderness continuum, and that they are influenced by abrupt changes in access.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ECOL INDIC, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.009
[2]  
Arnberger Arne, 2003, Journal for Nature Conservation (Jena), V11, P260, DOI 10.1078/1617-1381-00057
[3]   Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being [J].
Ayala-Azcarraga, Cristina ;
Diaz, Daniel ;
Zambrano, Luis .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 189 :27-35
[4]   A Global Perspective on Trends in Nature-Based Tourism [J].
Balmford, Andrew ;
Beresford, James ;
Green, Jonathan ;
Naidoo, Robin ;
Walpole, Matt ;
Manica, Andrea .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2009, 7 (06)
[5]   Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: Insights for landscape planning and management [J].
Baro, Francesc ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Haase, Dagmar .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 24 :147-159
[6]   Exploring cultural ecosystem service hotspots: Linking multiple urban forest features with public participation mapping data [J].
Baumeister, Christoph F. ;
Gerstenberg, Tina ;
Plieninger, Tobias ;
Schraml, Ulrich .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2020, 48
[7]  
Beichler Simone Annerose, 2015, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V11, P250, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2015.1059891
[8]   Preferences for cultural urban ecosystem services: Comparing attitudes, perception, and use [J].
Bertram, Christine ;
Rehdanz, Katrin .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 12 :187-199
[9]  
Breuste Jurgen., 2013, Ekologia Bratislava, V32, P290, DOI [10.2478/eko-2013-0026, DOI 10.2478/EKO-2013-0026]
[10]   Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Kytta, Marketta .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 46 :122-136