Seismic Pounding Response of Singled-Degree-of-Freedom Elastic and Inelastic Structures Using Passive Tuned Mass Damper

被引:19
作者
Mate, N. U. [1 ]
Bakre, S. V. [1 ]
Jaiswal, O. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Visvesvaraya Natl Inst Technol, Dept Appl Mech, Nagpur 440010, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Seismic pounding; SDOF elastic and inelastic stick system; Time-history analysis; Passive tuned mass damper; Gap element; Push-over analysis; ADJACENT STRUCTURES; BUILDINGS; VIBRATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40999-017-0178-7
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The present paper addresses the comparative study of two adjacent single-degree-of-freedom structures for elastic and inelastic systems with and without pounding. The study is also carried out in the presence and absence of tuned mass damper under (TMD) seismic excitations. The tuned mass damper considered for the present study is a passive device attached to single main structural unit in the simplest form as soft storey at the top of main system. Total eight models have been considered depending upon the presence and absence of pounding as well as TMD in the analysis. The entire numerical simulation is carried out in time domain form by considering the inputs of four real earthquake ground motions. Outcome of the present study indicates that elastic adjacent structural system always overrates the pounding forces than the inelastic adjacent structural units. The use of TMD reduces the pounding forces in the adjacent structures. During pounding, the results show that the structural displacement response is much more sensitive for inelastic systems mostly under consideration or ignorance of TMD. One of the observations is that there is large amount of variation in the structural energy formation of adjacent structures while considering or ignoring the pounding as well as TMD.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1005
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Use of a shared tuned mass damper (STMD) to reduce vibration and pounding in adjacent structures [J].
Abdullah, MM ;
Hanif, JH ;
Richardson, A ;
Sobanjo, J .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2001, 30 (08) :1185-1201
[2]  
Agarwal P., 2012, ISET GOLD JUB S
[3]   Use of collision shear walls to minimize seismic separation and to protect adjacent buildings from collapse due to earthquake-induced pounding [J].
Anagnostopoulos, S. A. ;
Karamaneas, C. E. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2008, 37 (12) :1371-1388
[4]   POUNDING OF BUILDINGS IN SERIES DURING EARTHQUAKES [J].
ANAGNOSTOPOULOS, SA .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1988, 16 (03) :443-456
[5]  
Beretero VV, 1975, 7516 EERC U CAL
[6]   Seismic response of adjacent buildings connected with friction dampers [J].
Bhaskararao, A. V. ;
Jangid, R. S. .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 4 (01) :43-64
[7]   Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic poundings between two adjacent structures [J].
Chau, KT ;
Wei, XX ;
Guo, X ;
Shen, CY .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2003, 32 (04) :537-554
[8]   POUNDING OF BUILDINGS MODELED BY AN IMPACT OSCILLATOR [J].
DAVIS, RO .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1992, 21 (03) :253-274
[9]  
Dogruel S., 2005, APPL GENETIC ALGORIT
[10]  
Farghaly Ahmed Abdelraheem, 2017, International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, V9, P51, DOI 10.1007/s40091-017-0148-y