LASSI's great adventure: A meta-analysis of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory and academic outcomes

被引:21
作者
Fong, Carlton J. [1 ]
Krou, Megan R. [1 ]
Johnston-Ashton, Karen [1 ]
Hoff, Meagan A. [2 ]
Lin, Shengjie [3 ]
Gonzales, Cassandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas State Univ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, San Marcos, TX USA
[2] Collin Coll, Mckinney, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Educ Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Learning and study strategies inventory; LASSI; Learning strategies; Academic achievement; meta-Analysis; ROBUST VARIANCE-ESTIMATION; SMALL-SAMPLE ADJUSTMENTS; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; SELF-REGULATION; MOTIVATED STRATEGIES; HIGHER-EDUCATION; MATURE STUDENTS; EFFECT SIZES; HIGH-SCHOOL; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100407
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
There have been considerable efforts to describe, examine, and foster the strategies students use while learning. Defined as thoughts, behaviors, beliefs, or emotions that facilitate knowledge acquisition, learning strategies play an essential role in students' achievement. This study reports on a random-effects meta-analysis of 158 studies (2,897 effect sizes; N = 71,852 students) on relationships between learning and study strategies, as measured by ten subscales of an established and prevalent instrument, the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI; Weinstein et al., 1987, 2004, 2016), and academic outcomes measured as GPA/grades, test scores, and persistence. Results indicated that motivation strategies had the highest positive correlations with GPA and persistence outcomes. For test scores, test taking strategies, anxiety, and selecting main ideas were the strongest positive correlates. Associations between LASSI subscales and outcomes were moderated by age, indicating lower correlations among students in postsecondary contexts compared to K-12 settings. Implications for research and practice regarding the role of strategic learning are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]   Learning and study strategies and engagement among Egyptian undergraduates: do gender and discipline matter? [J].
Abulela, Mohammed A. A. ;
Bart, William M. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 41 (09) :1160-1179
[2]   Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies [J].
Afflerbach, Peter ;
Pearson, P. David ;
Paris, Scott G. .
READING TEACHER, 2008, 61 (05) :364-373
[3]  
Alexander P. A., 2018, OXFORD HDB ED PSYCHO, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199841332.013.23, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199841332.013.23]
[4]   COMING TO TERMS - HOW RESEARCHERS IN LEARNING AND LITERACY TALK ABOUT KNOWLEDGE [J].
ALEXANDER, PA ;
SCHALLERT, DL ;
HARE, VC .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 61 (03) :315-343
[5]  
Alexander PA, 1998, LEARNING FROM TEXT ACROSS CONCEPTUAL DOMAINS, P263
[6]   THE INTERACTION OF DOMAIN-SPECIFIC AND STRATEGIC KNOWLEDGE IN ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE [J].
ALEXANDER, PA ;
JUDY, JE .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1988, 58 (04) :375-404
[7]  
American Psychological Association, 2018, Stress in America: Generation Z
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, LASSI LEARNING STUDY
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1998, EDUC PSYCHOL-UK, DOI DOI 10.1080/0144341980180403
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Handbook of self-regulation