Vertical integration, innovation and foreclosure with competing ecosystems

被引:2
|
作者
Bisceglia, Michele [1 ,2 ]
Padilla, Jorge [3 ]
Piccolo, Salvatore [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shekhar, Shiva [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Toulouse Sch Econ, Toulouse, France
[2] Univ Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
[3] Compass Lexecon, Washington, DC 20004 USA
[4] CSEF, Naples, Italy
[5] Univ Passau, Passau, Germany
关键词
Competing ecosystems; Foreclosure; Innovation; Vertical mergers; PRICE; CONTRACTS; MANUFACTURERS; INFERENCE; RETAILERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.100981
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study the competitive effects of a vertical merger in a digital industry where an integrated incumbent (closed ecosystem) competes with an open ecosystem formed by an upstream supplier (ecosystem gatekeeper) and two downstream retailers selling differentiated products. Absent innovation, the incumbent sells a superior product compared to the rivals' ones. Yet, the gatekeeper of the open ecosystem can fill up this gap by engaging in product innovation. We investigate the impact of vertical integration on the gatekeeper's incentives to foreclose its non-integrated downstream unit and innovate its ecosystem to compete head-to-head with the incumbent. The vertically integrated gatekeeper raises the costs of the unintegrated competitor to relax intra-ecosystem competition but does not fully foreclose it as that would cause fiercer inter-ecosystem competition. Moreover, vertical integration enhances innovation within the open ecosystem, enabling its participants to catch up with the incumbent. Overall, vertical integration may benefit consumers even when it softens intra-ecosystem competition. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The causal effects of product innovation, web technology and vertical integration on firm efficiency in the fashion industry
    Hurtado Gonzalez, Jose Manuel
    Herrero Chacon, Ines
    INNOVATION-MANAGEMENT POLICY & PRACTICE, 2014, 16 (01): : 144 - 157
  • [42] Cyclic dependence, vertical integration, and innovation: The case of Japanese electronics sector in the 1990s
    Luo, Jianxi
    Triulzi, Giorgio
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 132 : 46 - 55
  • [43] Innovation ecosystems: a meta-synthesis
    Ferasso, Marcos
    Wunsch Takahashi, Adriana R.
    Prado Gimenez, Fernando A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION SCIENCE, 2018, 10 (04) : 495 - 518
  • [44] System thinking shaping innovation ecosystems
    Abreu, Antonio
    Urze, Paula
    OPEN ENGINEERING, 2016, 6 (01): : 418 - 425
  • [45] A Holistic Model of Building Innovation Ecosystems
    Rabelo, Ricardo J.
    Bernus, Peter
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (03): : 2250 - 2257
  • [46] A Systematic Review of Enterprise Innovation Ecosystems
    Feng, Lijie
    Lu, Jiarui
    Wang, Jinfeng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [47] Blockchain innovation ecosystems orchestration in construction
    Papadonikolaki, Eleni
    Tezel, Algan
    Yitmen, Ibrahim
    Hilletofth, Per
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2023, 123 (02) : 672 - 694
  • [48] Technological Innovation and the expansion of Entrepreneurship Ecosystems
    Jeff Muldoon
    Eric W. Liguori
    Shelby Solomon
    Josh Bendickson
    Review of Managerial Science, 2023, 17 : 1789 - 1808
  • [49] Vertical Integration as a Source of Hold-up
    Allain, Marie-Laure
    Chambolle, Claire
    Rey, Patrick
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2016, 83 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [50] Technological Innovation and the expansion of Entrepreneurship Ecosystems
    Muldoon, Jeff
    Liguori, Eric W.
    Solomon, Shelby
    Bendickson, Josh
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2023, 17 (05) : 1789 - 1808