An Examination of the Parent-Rated Adolescent Academic Problems Checklist: What Do Parents Really Know?

被引:0
作者
Benson, Kari [1 ]
Evans, Steven W. [1 ]
Sibley, Margaret H. [2 ]
Allan, Darcey M. [1 ]
Owens, Julie Sarno [1 ]
DuPaul, George J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Lehigh Univ, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
关键词
ADHD; Adolescent; Parent; Assessment; Academic; DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; IMPAIRMENT; SYMPTOMS; ADHD; CHILDREN; RELIABILITY; ASSESSMENTS; INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1007/s10862-021-09942-8
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience academic difficulties, but there are limitations to current methods of measuring these problems. The parent-rated Adolescent Academic Problems Checklist (AAPC) is a particularly promising measure, as the items were derived from concerns of parents and teachers of adolescents with ADHD and the scale demonstrates good concurrent validity and treatment sensitivity (Sibley et al. in School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 422, 2014; Sibley et al. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(8), 699, 2016b). Because parents do not observe some academic behaviors queried on the AAPC, they may provide inaccurate responses to some items, leading to measurement error. In the current study, we sought to (1) determine the extent to which parents of adolescents with ADHD possess knowledge of the academic behaviors assessed on the AAPC, (2) determine if the scale maintains the two-factor structure (academic skills and disruptive behavior) and continues to relate to indicators of academic functioning after removing items associated with low parent knowledge, and (3) validate findings with the revised scale in a separate sample of adolescents with ADHD. Results identified five items for which the majority of parents reported little to no knowledge. When removing items with low parental knowledge, the AAPC's model fit was maintained and the two-factor model remained a better fit than the one-factor model. The relationships between the revised subscales and measures of academic functioning remained significant and largely equivalent to the original version. The revised model demonstrated similar fit in the second sample and was also related to indicators of academic functioning. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 164
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Asparouhov T., 2010, WEIGHTED LEAST SQUAR, V2010, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/0165-1765(94)90069-8
  • [2] Brady CE, 2012, SCHOOL PSYCHOL REV, V41, P429
  • [3] Informant discrepancies in assessments of psychosocial functioning in school-based services and research: Review and directions for future research
    De Los Reyes, Andres
    Cook, Clayton R.
    Gresham, Frank M.
    Makol, Bridget A.
    Wang, Mo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 74 : 74 - 89
  • [4] Development and validation of the academic competence evaluation scales
    DiPerna, JC
    Elliott, SN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 1999, 17 (03) : 207 - 225
  • [5] DuPaul G., 2016, ADHD RATING SCALE 5
  • [6] School-based intervention for adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Effects on academic functioning
    DuPaul, George J.
    Evans, Steven W.
    Owens, Julie Sarno
    Cleminshaw, Courtney L.
    Kipperman, Kristen
    Fu, Qiong
    Benson, Kari
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 87 : 48 - 63
  • [7] High School Teacher Ratings of Academic, Social, and Behavioral Difficulties: Factor Structure and Normative Data for the School Functioning Scale
    DuPaul, George J.
    Evans, Steven W.
    Allan, Darcey
    Puzino, Kristina
    Xiang, Joe
    Cooper, Jennifer
    Owens, Julie Sarno
    [J]. SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 34 (05) : 479 - 491
  • [8] Elliott S.N., 2001, AIMS ACAD INTERVENTI
  • [9] Evans, 2020, ASSESSMENT CHILDHOOD
  • [10] Evans S.W., 2005, ATTENTION, V14, P29