Comparison between two different full-wave methods for the computation of nonlinear ultrasound fields in inhomogeneous and attenuating tissue

被引:3
|
作者
Demi, L. [1 ]
Treeby, B. E. [2 ]
Verweij, M. D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Lab Biomed Diagnost, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] UCL, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Eng, London, England
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Lab Acoust Wavefield Imaging, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
MEDIA;
D O I
10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0362
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Nonlinear propagation is important in many diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical ultrasound. The design of equipment and protocols for nonlinear modalities is facilitated by the simulation of the nonlinear ultrasound field. However, many existing simulation tools have difficulties of dealing with realistic features like tissue inhomogeneity, power law losses, or steered beams. Recently, two full-wave simulation methods for nonlinear ultrasound have been developed that are able to deal with these features. Those methods are known as the Iterative Nonlinear Contrast Source method (INCS; an integral equation method) and k-Wave (a pseudospectral time domain method). This paper assesses the accuracy of both methods by comparing their spatial and spectral results for two test configurations. In both configurations, a square piston excites a three-cycle Gaussian-modulated tone burst with a center frequency of 1 MHz and a source pressure of 750 kPa. The medium in the first configuration is homogeneous and has a speed of sound, density of mass and parameter of nonlinearity equal to that of water, and a power law attenuation with an exponent 1.5 and a magnitude of 0.75 dB/cm at 1 MHz. In the second configuration, the medium has been made inhomogeneous by putting a hollow cylinder (speed of sound equal to 1540 m/s) and a solid sphere (parameter of nonlinearity equal to 1) in the course of the radiated beam. In both cases, the results obtained with INCS and k-Wave are in excellent agreement, with maximum local differences in the order of 0.5-0.6 dB in the significant parts of the field. Because both methods are computationally quite different, it is improbable that these both suffer from the same systematic error. Hence it is established that both methods are correct and highly accurate, and are suitable tools for performing precise simulations and generating accuracy benchmarks.
引用
收藏
页码:1464 / 1467
页数:4
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] A Heterogeneous Nonlinear Attenuating Full-Wave Model of Ultrasound
    Pinton, Gianmarco F.
    Dahl, Jeremy
    Rosenzweig, Stephen
    Trahey, Gregg E.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2009, 56 (03) : 474 - 488
  • [2] Linearization strategies for the Iterative Nonlinear Contrast Source method for full-wave simulation of nonlinear ultrasound fields
    Verweij, Martin D.
    Demi, Libertario
    van Dongen, Koen W. A.
    NONLINEAR ACOUSTICS: STATE-OF-THE-ART AND PERSPECTIVES (ISNA 19), 2012, 1474 : 244 - 247
  • [3] Energetic aspects of bioclimatic buildings in the Mediterranean area: a comparison between two different computation methods
    Cardinale, N
    Ruggiero, F
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2000, 31 (01) : 55 - 63
  • [4] Comparison Between Ray-Tracing and Full-Wave Simulation for Transcranial Ultrasound Focusing on a Clinical System Using the Transfer Matrix Formalism
    Bancel, Thomas
    Houdouin, Alexandre
    Annic, Philippe
    Rachmilevitch, Itay
    Shapira, Yeruham
    Tanter, Mickael
    Aubry, Jean-Francois
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2021, 68 (07) : 2554 - 2565