CT-based classification of long spinal allograft fusion

被引:57
作者
Tan, G. H.
Goss, B. G.
Thorpe, P. J.
Williams, R. P.
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, AOSpine Ref Ctr, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] Princess Alexandra Hosp, AOSpine Ref Ctr, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
关键词
thoracolumbar reconstruction; femoral allograft; CT; interobserver;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-007-0376-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Anterior column reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine by structural allograft has an increased potential for biological fusion when compared to synthetic reconstructive options. Estimation of cortical union and trabecular in-growth is, however, traditionally based on plain radiography, a technique lacking in sensitivity. A new assessment method of bony union using high-speed spiral CT imaging is proposed which reflects the gradually increasing biological stability of the construct. Grade I (complete fusion) implies cortical union of the allograft and central trabecular continuity. Grade II (partial fusion) implies cortical union of the structural allograft with partial trabecular incorporation. Grade III (unipolar pseudarthrosis) denotes superior or inferior cortical non-union of the central allograft with partial trabecular discontinuity centrally and Grade IV (bipolar pseudarthrosis) suggests both superior and inferior cortical non-union with a complete lack of central trabecular continuity. Twenty-five patients underwent anterior spinal reconstruction for a single level burst fracture between T4 and L5. At a minimum of two years follow up the subjects underwent high-speed spiral CT scanning through the reconstructed region of the thoracolumbar spine. The classification showed satisfactory interobserver (kappa score = 0.91) and intraobserver (kappa score = 0.95) reliability. The use of high-speed CT imaging in the assessment of structural allograft union may allow a more accurate assessment of union. The classification system presented allows a reproducible categorization of allograft incorporation with implications for treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1875 / 1881
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Albee FH, 1911, J Am Med Assoc, V57, P885, DOI 10.1001/jama.1911.04260090107012
[2]   Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate: A prospective comparative analysis [J].
Bishop, RC ;
Moore, KA ;
Hadley, MN .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 85 (02) :206-210
[3]  
BRIDWELL KH, 1995, SPINE, V20, P1410, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199506000-00014
[4]   Revision of failed lumbar fusions - A comparison of anterior autograft and allograft [J].
Buttermann, GR ;
Glazer, PA ;
Hu, SS ;
Bradford, DS .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (23) :2748-2755
[7]   Osteogenic protein versus autologous interbody arthrodesis in the sheep thoracic spine -: A comparative endoscopic study using the Bagby and Kuslich interbody fusion device [J].
Cunningham, BW ;
Kanayama, M ;
Parker, LM ;
Weis, JC ;
Sefter, JC ;
Fedder, IL ;
McAfee, PC .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (06) :509-518
[8]  
Ehrler DM, 2000, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P38
[9]   HIGH SPATIAL-RESOLUTION IMAGING OF BONE-MINERAL USING COMPUTED MICROTOMOGRAPHY - COMPARISON WITH MICRORADIOGRAPHY AND UNDECALCIFIED HISTOLOGIC SECTIONS [J].
ENGELKE, K ;
GRAEFF, W ;
MEISS, L ;
HAHN, M ;
DELLING, G .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1993, 28 (04) :341-349
[10]  
HIBBS R, 1912, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V59, P43