Transit-oriented development in an urban rail transportation corridor

被引:34
作者
Peng, Ya-Ting [1 ]
Li, Zhi-Chun [1 ]
Choi, Keechoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Ajou Univ, Dept Transportat Engn, San 5 Woncheon Dong, Suwon 442749, South Korea
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Transit-oriented development; Rail transportation corridor; Households' residential location choices; Housing market; Public and private regimes; Social welfare; EFFECTIVE 2ND-BEST REMEDY; LAND-USE; MONOCENTRIC CITY; OPEN SPACE; EQUILIBRIUM; CONGESTION; DENSITY; DESIGN; MODEL; RIDERSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2017.03.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Transit-oriented development (TOD) has been recognized as an important avenue for creating a green transportation system. This paper addresses TOD investment issue in terms of the location, number and size of the TOD zones along a rail line. An urban system equilibrium problem with TOD investment is first formulated. Two social welfare maximization models, which take into account different investment regimes for TOD projects (i.e., public and private), are then proposed for optimizing TOD investment schemes along a rail line and train service frequency on that line. In the public regime model, the government is responsible for the investment cost of TOD projects, which is borne by the private property developers in the private regime model. The proposed models explicitly consider the interactions among the government, property developers and households in the urban system, together with the effects of the TOD investment on households' residential location choices and housing market. The population thresholds for investing in a TOD project under the public and private regimes are also identified. The findings show that the TOD investment can cause population agglomeration at the TOD zones and a compact city; households and the society can benefit from the TOD investment; and the private TOD investment regime outperforms the public regime in terms of total social welfare of urban system. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 290
页数:22
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]  
Cervero R., 2004, Transit-oriented development in the United States: Experiences, challenges, and prospects, V102
[12]   Transit-oriented development's ridership bonus: a product of self-selection and public policies [J].
Cervero, Robert .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2007, 39 (09) :2068-2085
[13]   Suburbanization and transit-oriented development in China [J].
Cervero, Robert ;
Day, Jennifer .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2008, 15 (05) :315-323
[14]   A bi-level model of the relationship between transport and residential location [J].
Chang, JS ;
Mackett, RL .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2006, 40 (02) :123-146
[15]   Rail-based public transport and urban spatial structure: The interplay between network design, congestion and urban form [J].
Droes, Martijn I. ;
Rietveld, Piet .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2015, 81 :421-439
[16]   The Impact of Transit-oriented Development on Housing Prices in San Diego, CA [J].
Duncan, Michael .
URBAN STUDIES, 2011, 48 (01) :101-127
[17]   A model for integrated analysis of household location and travel choices [J].
Eliasson, J ;
Mattsson, LG .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2000, 34 (05) :375-394
[18]  
Fujita K., 2013, CITIES CRISIS NEW CR
[19]   Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York [J].
Hess, Daniel Baldwin ;
Almeida, Tangerine Maria .
URBAN STUDIES, 2007, 44 (5-6) :1041-1068
[20]   Residential property valuations near transit stations with transit-oriented development [J].
Kay, Andrew I. ;
Noland, Robert B. ;
DiPetrillo, Stephanie .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 39 :131-140