Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard

被引:99
作者
Wu, Hung-Yi [1 ]
Lin, Yi-Kuei [2 ]
Chang, Chi-Hsiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chiayi Univ, Dept Business Adm, Chiayi 60054, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Management, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
[3] Vanung Univ, Continuing Educ & Vocat Training Ctr, Tao Yuan 32061, Taiwan
关键词
Extension education; Performance evaluation; Balanced scorecard (BSC); Decision making trial and evaluation; laboratory (DEMATEL); Analytic network process (ANP); VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR); HYBRID MODEL; MCDM MODEL; PROGRAMS; DEMATEL; MANAGEMENT; DECISION; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.001
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study aims at developing a set of appropriate performance evaluation indices mainly based on balanced scorecard (BSC) for extension education centers in universities by utilizing multiple criteria decision making (MCDM). Through literature reviews and experts who have real practical experiences in extension education, adequate performance evaluation indices have been selected and then utilizing the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and analytic network process (ANP), respectively, further establishes the causality between the four BSC perspectives as well as the relative weights between evaluation indices. According to this previous result, an empirical analysis of the performance evaluation of extension education centers of three universities at Taoyuan County in Taiwan is illustrated by applying VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). From the analysis results, it indicates that "Learning and growth" is the significant influential factor and it would affect the other three perspectives. In addition, it is discovered that "Internal process" perspective as well as "Financial" perspective play important roles in the performance evaluation of extension education centers. The top three key performance indices are "After-sales service", "Turnover volume", and "Net income". The proposed evaluation model could be considered as a reference for extension education centers in universities to prioritize their improvements on the key performance indices after performing VIKOR analyses. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 50
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], FAC CIV ENG
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, DOI [10.1504/ijmdm.2006.009140, DOI 10.1504/IJMDM.2006.009140]
  • [3] Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach
    Bhagwat, Rajat
    Sharma, Milind Kumar
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 53 (01) : 43 - 62
  • [4] A Pro-performance appraisal system for the university
    Chen, Jui-Kuei
    Chen, I-Shuo
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (03) : 2108 - 2116
  • [5] Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education
    Chen, Jui-Kuei
    Chen, I-Shuo
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (03) : 1981 - 1990
  • [6] Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model
    Chen, Yi-Chun
    Lien, Hui-Pang
    Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (02) : 926 - 938
  • [7] *DEP STAT, 2008, STAT SCH NUMB COLL U
  • [8] Dixon J.R., 1990, NEW PERFORMANCE CHAL
  • [9] DUQRETTE DJ, 1993, GOVT ACCOUNTANTS J, V42, P27
  • [10] Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors
    Erdogmus, S
    Kapanoglu, M
    Koç, E
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2005, 28 (04) : 391 - 399