The impact of fiscal decentralization on CO2 emissions in China

被引:123
作者
Cheng, Shulei [1 ]
Fan, Wei [2 ]
Chen, Jiandong [1 ]
Meng, Fanxin [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Gengyuan [4 ]
Song, Malin [5 ]
Yang, Zhifeng [6 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Adm, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[5] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Appl Math, Bengbu 233030, Anhui, Peoples R China
[6] Guangdong Univ Technol, Inst Environm Ecol Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Fiscal decentralization; Energy consumption; CO2; emissions; LMDI decomposition; Dynamic panel regression; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT; REGULATORY COMPETITION; ENERGY; INTENSITY; ACHIEVE; CONSUMPTION; REDUCTION; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2019.116685
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper evaluates the impact of fiscal decentralization on CO2 emissions in China. We build an equation to combine fiscal decentralization and CO2 emissions and decompose it using the logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) decomposition technique. Then, we examine the nonlinear impact of fiscal decentralization on CO2 emissions using a dynamic panel regression model and Chinese interprovincial data from 1997 to 2015. The empirical results show that the direct impact of fiscal decentralization on CO2 emissions is nonlinear, and the higher the per capita fiscal expenditure, the more fiscal decentralization can reduce CO2 emissions. Moreover, the government's emissions reduction policies effectively reduce CO2 emissions only when they are conducted at the provincial and city levels, and some differences among regions remain. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Bridging the gap between energy-to-GDP ratio and composite energy intensity index [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Goh, Tian .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 119 :105-112
[2]   LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation [J].
Ang, B. W. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 86 :233-238
[3]   Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition [J].
Ang, BW ;
Zhang, FQ ;
Choi, KH .
ENERGY, 1998, 23 (06) :489-495
[4]   Rescaling governance and the impacts of political and environmental decentralization: An introduction [J].
Batterbury, Simon P. J. ;
Fernando, Jude L. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (11) :1851-1863
[5]   Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: do carbon taxes work? [J].
Bruvoll, A ;
Larsen, BM .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (04) :493-505
[6]   Combining physical and economic output data to analyse energy and CO2 emissions trends in industry [J].
Cahill, Caiman J. ;
Gallachoir, Brian P. O. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 49 :422-429
[7]   Will China comply with its 2020 carbon intensity commitment? [J].
Cansino, Jose M. ;
Roman, Rocio ;
Rueda-Cantuche, Jose M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 47 :108-117
[8]   Changes in energy-related carbon dioxide emissions of the agricultural sector in China from 2005 to 2013 [J].
Chen, Jiandong ;
Cheng, Shulei ;
Song, Malin .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 94 :748-761
[9]  
Chen JD, 2018, TRANSFORM BUS ECON, V17, P112
[10]   A carbon emissions reduction index: Integrating the volume and allocation of regional emissions [J].
Chen, Jiandong ;
Cheng, Shulei ;
Song, Malin ;
Wu, Yinyin .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 184 :1154-1164