Smoothing of digital elevation models and the alteration of overland flow path length distributions

被引:5
作者
Van Nieuwenhuizen, Nigel [1 ]
Lindsay, John B. [1 ]
DeVries, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Geog Environm & Geomat, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
digital elevation models; flow path modelling; hydrology; LiDAR; roughness; smoothing; MORPHOMETRY; CATCHMENTS; IMPACT; AREAS;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.14271
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
DEM smoothing is a common pre-processing technique used to remove undesirable roughness from a DEM. However, it is hypothesized that smoothing straightens and reduces the length of overland flow paths, which is an important factor controlling modelled time-to-peak flow. Currently, there is a lack of research comparing how different smoothing techniques alter the distribution of overland flow path length. Four low-pass filtering techniques were applied to three fine-resolution LiDAR DEMs of varying relief: the mean filter, the median filter, the Gaussian filter, and the feature-preserving DEM smoothing (FPDEMS) filter, each with different degrees of smoothing. Downslope-distance-to-stream distributions were then derived using D8 and D infinity flow directions and statistically compared to distributions derived from the unsmoothed DEM for each study site. The results indicate that the alteration of flow path length distributions as a result of smoothing is complex. Mean flow path lengths may decrease or increase in response to smoothing, depending on landscape relief and the derivation of flow directions, and generalized flow paths may become longer. The largest increase in mean flow path lengths was 19.2 m using the 21 x 21 median filter and D8 flow directions in the high-relief study site, relative to an unsmoothed mean length of 138.6 m in this site. The largest decrease in mean flow path length was 48.9 m using the 21 x 21 mean filter and D infinity flow directions in the low-relief study site, relative to an unsmoothed mean length of 290.9 m in this site. Furthermore, minimal flow path length alterations were achieved with the Gaussian filter when gentle smoothing is required, and with the FPDEMS filter when moderate to aggressive smoothing is required. These results suggest that an appropriate smoothing method should be chosen based on the relief of the landscape and the degree of smoothing required.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   Evaluation of Lidar-derived DEMs through Terrain Analysis and Field Comparison [J].
Gillin, Cody P. ;
Bailey, Scott W. ;
McGuire, Kevin J. ;
Prisley, Stephen P. .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 81 (05) :387-396
[12]  
Govers G, 2000, AGRONOMIE, V20, P131, DOI 10.1051/agro:2000114
[13]  
Hallema DennisW., 2016, ECOL PROCESS, V5, DOI DOI 10.1186/s13717-016-0057-1
[14]   Satellite-derived Digital Elevation Model (DEM) selection, preparation and correction for hydrodynamic modelling in large, low-gradient and data-sparse catchments [J].
Jarihani, Abdollah A. ;
Callow, John N. ;
McVicar, Tim R. ;
Van Niel, Thomas G. ;
Larsen, Joshua R. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 524 :489-506
[15]  
Lindsay J.B., 2020, WHITEBOXTOOLS V 1 4
[16]   Removal of artifact depressions from digital elevation models: towards a minimum impact approach [J].
Lindsay, JB ;
Creed, IF .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2005, 19 (16) :3113-3126
[17]   LiDAR DEM Smoothing and the Preservation of Drainage Features [J].
Lindsay, John B. ;
Francioni, Anthony ;
Cockburn, Jaclyn M. H. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (16)
[18]   A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modelling [J].
Liu, YB ;
Gebremeskel, S ;
De Smedt, F ;
Hoffmann, L ;
Pfister, L .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2003, 283 (1-4) :91-106
[19]  
Ma S., 2021, WATER RESOURCE MANAG, DOI [10.21203/rs.3.rs-311838/v1, DOI 10.21203/RS.3.RS-311838/V1]
[20]  
National Center for Airborne Laser Mapping, 2020, OpenTopo, DOI 10.5069/G97W694V