The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers

被引:65
作者
Wilson, Richard H.
Carnell, Crystal S.
Cleghorn, Amber L.
机构
[1] VA Med Ctr, Mountain Home, TN 37684 USA
[2] E Tennessee State Univ, Dept Surg & Communicat Disorders, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
关键词
auditory perception; hearing loss; multitalker babble; speech perception; speech-spectrum noise; word recognition in multitalker babble;
D O I
10.3766/jaaa.18.6.7
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test uses monosyllabic words in seven signal-to-noise ratios of multitalker babble (MTB) to evaluate the ability of individuals to understand speech in background noise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the criterion validity of the WIN by comparing recognition performances under MTB and speech-spectrum noise (SSN) using listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. The MTB and SSN had identical rms and similar spectra but different amplitude-modulation characteristics. The performances by the listeners with normal hearing, which were 2 dB better in MTB than in SSN, were about 10 dB better than the performances by the listeners with hearing loss, which were about 0.5 dB better in MTB with 56% of the listeners better in MTB and 40% better in SSN. The slopes of the functions for the normal-hearing listeners (8-9%/dB) were steeper than the functions for the listeners with hearing loss (5-6%/dB). The data indicate that the WIN has good criterion validity.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 529
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   EFFECTS OF FLUCTUATING NOISE AND INTERFERING SPEECH ON THE SPEECH-RECEPTION THRESHOLD FOR IMPAIRED AND NORMAL HEARING [J].
FESTEN, JM ;
PLOMP, R .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1990, 88 (04) :1725-1736
[12]  
Finney DJ, 1952, STAT METHOD BIOL ASS
[13]  
Holma T, 1997, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, P71
[14]   Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners [J].
Killion, MC ;
Niquette, PA ;
Gudmundsen, GI ;
Revit, LJ ;
Banerjee, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 116 (04) :2395-2405
[15]  
Killion Mead C., 2002, Seminars in Hearing, V23, P57, DOI 10.1055/s-2002-24976
[16]  
McArdle Rachel A, 2005, J Am Acad Audiol, V16, P726, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.16.9.9
[17]   THE INTELLIGIBILITY OF INTERRUPTED SPEECH [J].
MILLER, GA ;
LICKLIDER, JCR .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1950, 22 (02) :167-173
[18]   THE MASKING OF SPEECH [J].
MILLER, GA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1947, 44 (02) :105-129
[19]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE HEARING IN NOISE TEST FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLDS IN QUIET AND IN NOISE [J].
NILSSON, M ;
SOLI, SD ;
SULLIVAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1994, 95 (02) :1085-1099
[20]  
Niquette P, 2003, ANN M AM AUD SOC SCO