The Impact of National Economic Culture and Country-Level Institutional Environment on Corporate Governance Practices Theory and Empirical Evidence

被引:69
作者
Daniel, Shirley J. [1 ]
Cieslewicz, Joshua K. [2 ]
Pourjalali, Hamid [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Sch Accountancy, Shidler Coll Business, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Utah Valley Univ, Dept Accounting, Woodbury Sch Business, Orem, UT USA
关键词
Corporate governance; National culture; Institutional environment; Country infrastructure; Structural equation modeling; MANAGEMENT; LAW; DIVERSITY; DIFFUSION; PATTERNS; SYSTEMS; STOCK;
D O I
10.1007/s11575-011-0108-x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We posit that national cultural practices influence the institutional environment, which in turn has an influence on corporate governance practices. We empirically evaluate these relationships using structural equation modeling. We utilize measures of national culture from Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The Globe study of 62 Societies. For the institutional environment, we employ the World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators. Consistent with theory, we find a strong relationship between these constructs. We further find that the institutional environment mediates the relationship between national culture and corporate governance practices. Corporate governance practices include measures of board accountability, financial disclosure and internal controls, shareholder rights, executive compensation, takeover defenses and ownership base, and corporate accountability and are available from Governance Metrics International. As both culture and institutions are linked to corporate governance practices, efforts to change corporate governance practices around the world are best informed by an appreciation of cultural as well as institutional factors.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 394
页数:30
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Aggarwal R., 2007, REM AIB ANN M IND IN
[2]   The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants [J].
Aguilera, RV ;
Jackson, G .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (03) :447-465
[3]  
Amable Bruno., 2003, DIVERSITY MODERN CAP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/6867.001.0001
[5]  
Arbuckle J.L., 1999, AMOS 40 USERS GUIDE
[6]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[7]   Hofstede never studied culture [J].
Baskerville, RF .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2003, 28 (01) :1-14
[8]   A research note: the unfinished business of culture [J].
Baskerville-Morley, RF .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2005, 30 (04) :389-391
[9]   PRACTICAL ISSUES IN STRUCTURAL MODELING [J].
BENTLER, PM ;
CHOU, CP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1987, 16 (01) :78-117
[10]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588