Promoting or Inhibiting? The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Financial Performance-An Empirical Analysis Based on China

被引:34
作者
Deng, Xiang [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Econ, 24 South Sect 1 Yihuan Rd, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
environmental regulation; new environmental protection law; corporate financial performance; environmental supervision intensity; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; INNOVATION; POLLUTION; COMPETITIVENESS; POLICY; FIRMS; HETEROGENEITY; MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; TRADE;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17113828
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Today, environmental protection has become a global issue, and various environmental regulations have been actively adopted. However, are these measures promoting or harming enterprise values? Is this effect the same for enterprises with different ownership backgrounds? In order to address these problems, we conducted an empirical analysis of China's A-share market to investigate the relationship between the New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) launched in China and corporate financial performance, and further explore the impact of environmental supervision intensity (ESI) from the perspective of ownership. The empirical results show that there is a negative correlation between NEPL and the financial performance of high pollution enterprises. Further analysis demonstrates that there is an inverted U-shape relationship between ESI and corporate financial performance for both state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs), while the financial performance of SOEs is more sensitive and tolerant to environmental regulation than that of non-SOEs. Finally, we make recommendations for the future direction of China's ecological civilization construction and sustainable development of enterprises based on three aspects: environmental awareness, policy considerations, and sustainable development. The innovation of this paper lies in putting NEPL and corporate financial performance in the same analytical framework for the first time, which enriches the research in this field. Meanwhile, it provides a new perspective for understanding the relationship between ESI and corporate financial performance through the analysis of nonlinearity and owner heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Adhikari Ajay., 2006, J ACCOUNT PUBLIC POL, V25, P574, DOI [10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.07.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2006.07.001]
[2]   Do some outside directors play a political role? [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Knoeber, CR .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2001, 44 (01) :179-198
[3]   Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms [J].
Albrizio, Silvia ;
Kozluk, Tomasz ;
Zipperer, Vera .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 :209-226
[4]   Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing [J].
Alpay, E ;
Buccola, S ;
Kerkvliet, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :887-901
[5]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, KYOT PROT UN FRAM CO
[7]   Environmental strategy and performance in small firms:: A resource-based perspective [J].
Aragon-Correa, J. Alberto ;
Hurtado-Torres, Nuria ;
Sharma, Sanjay ;
Garcia-Morales, Victor J. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 86 (01) :88-103
[8]  
Arimura T., 2007, Corporate Behaviour and Environmental Policy, P142
[9]   What Determines Protection of Property Rights? An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects [J].
Ayyagari, Meghana ;
Demirguc-Kunt, Asli ;
Maksimovic, Vojislav .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2013, 11 (04) :610-649
[10]   A multitask theory of state enterprise reform [J].
Bai, CE ;
Li, DD ;
Tao, Z ;
Wang, YJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2000, 28 (04) :716-738