The effect of specimen shape and strain rate on uniaxial compressive behavior of rock material

被引:72
作者
Liang, C. Y. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Q. B. [3 ]
Li, X. [4 ]
Xin, P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Land & Mineral Resource, Key Lab Neotecton Movement & Geohazards, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Geol Sci, Inst Geomech, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Bldg 60, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Key Lab Engn Geomech, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
关键词
Shape effect; Strain rate; Uniaxial compressive strength; Fracture mode; Rock material; HOPKINSON PRESSURE BAR; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; LOADING RATE; FRACTURE; SIZE; FAILURE; STRESS; CRYSTALLINE; DILATANCY; CONCRETE;
D O I
10.1007/s10064-015-0811-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The mechanical properties of rock material with length/diameter ratios varying from 1.0 to 3.0 were determined using a newly developed servo-hydraulic machine at a wide range of strain rates. The uniaxial compressive strength, initiation and dilatancy stresses, peak axial strain, and strain energy gradually decreased with increasing length/diameter ratios at the same loading condition; for the same length/diameter ratio, these properties increased with increasing strain rate. The elastic modulus increased with increasing specimen shape and strain rate, whereas the Poisson's ratio was independent on these two factors. The fracture modes were significantly dependent on both strain rate and specimen shape. When the strain rate was below 10(-3) s(-1), splitting was the main fracture mode for the short specimens while the shearing fracture mode dominates the longer specimens; when the strain rate was above 10(-3) s(-1), the fracture mode changed directly from cone-shaped fractures to shearing fractures. The recommended length/diameter ratio was 2.5 at strain rates of 10(-5)-10(-2) s(-1).
引用
收藏
页码:1669 / 1681
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EXPT ROCK DEFORMATIO, DOI [DOI 10.1007/B137431, DOI 10.1007/3-540-26339-X_7]
[2]  
ASTM, 2008, ANN BOOK ASTM STAND, DOI [10.1520/D4543-08, DOI 10.1520/D4543-08]
[3]  
ASTM, 1996, ANN BOOK ASTM STAND, DOI [10.1520/D3148-96, DOI 10.1520/D3148-96]
[4]  
ASTM, 2014, ANN BOOK ASTM STAND, DOI [10.1520/D7012-14, DOI 10.1520/D7012-14]
[5]  
Bazant Z.P., 1997, Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials, V16
[6]  
Bieniawski Z.T., 1967, INT J ROCK MECH MIN, V4, P395, DOI DOI 10.1016/0148-9062(67)90030-7
[7]   SUGGESTED METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND DEFORMABILITY OF ROCK MATERIALS .2. SUGGESTED METHOD FOR DETERMINING DEFORMABILITY OF ROCK MATERIALS IN UNIAXIAL COMPRESSION [J].
BIENIAWSKI, ZT ;
BERNEDE, MJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1979, 16 (02) :138-140
[8]   Size effects and the dynamic response of plain concrete [J].
Bindiganavile, V. ;
Banthia, N. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2006, 18 (04) :485-491
[9]   EFFECTS OF SIZE AND STRESS CONCENTRATION ON DILATANCY AND FRACTURE OF ROCK [J].
BORDIA, SK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1971, 8 (06) :629-&
[10]   DILATANCY IN FRACTURE OF CRYSTALLINE ROCKS [J].
BRACE, WF ;
PAULDING, BW ;
SCHOLZ, C .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1966, 71 (16) :3939-&