Coprecipitation of arsenate with iron(III) in aqueous sulfate media: Effect of time, lime as base and co-ions on arsenic retention

被引:150
作者
Jia, Yongfeng [2 ]
Demopoulos, George P. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Min Met & Mat Engn, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B2, Canada
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Shenyang 110016, Peoples R China
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
coprecipitation; arsenate; iron;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The removal and immobilization of arsenic from industrial mineral-processing effluents typically involves lime neutralization and coprecipitation of arsenate with ferric iron. Despite the wide practice and environmental importance of this technique, no laboratory study has focused on the roles of lime as base and third ions like Ca2+, Ni2+ and SP42- on the kinetics of arsenic retention by the coprecipitates. In this work, coprecipitation was performed at 22 C by fast (10 min) neutralization of industrially relevant concentrated arsenate-iron(III) (Fe/As = 2, 4) acidic sulfate solutions to different pHs (4, 6, 8) in batch reactors, and the concentration of arsenic was monitored up to 1 year. The tests showed that maximum removal of arsenic was achieved upon neutralization to the target pH. Arsenic was found to be released back into solution from the precipitates upon continuing mild agitation at constant pH. Near-equilibrium was attained at different times depending on the applied pH: 10 days at pH 4, 6 months at pH 6 and 9 months at pH 8. An aging treatment at pH 4 significantly enhanced arsenic retention (arsenic release was reduced by at least 50%) after the system was finally stabilized at pH 8. The retention of arsenic at pH 8 was multifold improved (by a factor x 25) when lime was used instead of NaOH. Similarly, the retention of arsenic was enhanced by the presence of calcium and nickel ions in the starting solution. Finally, evidence of Ca(II)-Fe(III)-As(V) association was found, but not sulfate incorporation at pH 8. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 668
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Scavenging of as from acid mine drainage by schwertmannite and ferrihydrite: A comparison with synthetic analogues [J].
Carlson, L ;
Bigham, JM ;
Schwertmann, U ;
Kyek, A ;
Wagner, F .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (08) :1712-1719
[2]  
CHEN N, UNPUB GEOCHIM COSMOC
[3]  
Demopoulos GP, 2005, ARSENIC METALLURGY, P25
[4]  
DZOMBAK DA, 1990, SURFACE COMPLEXATION, P173
[5]  
EMETT MT, 1993, EPD C 1994, P153
[6]   Formation of metal-arsenate precipitates at the goethite-water interface [J].
Gräfe, M ;
Nachtegaal, M ;
Sparks, DL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (24) :6561-6570
[7]  
Harris B, 2003, HYDROMETALLURGY 2003 PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1889
[8]  
Harris G.B., 1988, ARSENIC METALLURGY F, P469
[9]  
Harris G. B., 1993, EXTRACTIVE METALLURG, V1, P1221
[10]  
Harris OJ, 2000, IMECHE CONF TRANS, V2000, P3