Accuracy of self-assessment of gestational duration among people seeking abortion

被引:25
|
作者
Ralph, Lauren J. [1 ]
Ehrenreich, Katherine [1 ]
Barar, Rana [1 ]
Biggs, M. Antonia [1 ]
Morris, Natalie [1 ]
Blanchard, Kelly [2 ]
Kapp, Nathalie [3 ]
Moayedi, Ghazaleh [4 ]
Perritt, Jamila [5 ]
Raymond, Elizabeth G. [6 ]
White, Kari [7 ]
Grossman, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Adv New Stand Reprod Hlth Res Grp, Oakland, CA 94607 USA
[2] Ibis Reprod Hlth, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Ipas, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Pegasus Hlth Justice Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[5] Phys Reprod Hlth, New York, NY USA
[6] Gynu Hlth Projects, Tacoma, WA USA
[7] Univ Texas Austin, Steve Hicks Sch Social Work & Dept Sociol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
gestational age; gestational duration; last menstrual period; medication abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; over-the-counter; pregnancy dating; pregnancy duration; self-selection; telehealth; ultrasound; OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; MEDICATION ABORTION; ROUTINE ULTRASOUND; RESTRICTIVE LAW; UNITED-STATES; PREGNANCY; TERMINATION; AGE; IMPLEMENTATION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1373
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Mifepristone, used together with misoprostol, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for medication abortion through 10 weeks' gestation. Although in-person ultrasound is frequently used to establish medication abortion eligibility, previous research demonstrates that people seeking abortion early in pregnancy can accurately self-assess gestational duration using the date of their last menstrual period. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we establish the screening performance of a broader set of questions for self-assessment of gestational duration among a sample of people seeking abortion at a wide range of gestations. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed patients seeking abortion at 7 facilities before ultrasound and compared self-assessments of gestational duration using 11 pregnancy dating questions with measurements on ultrasound. For individual pregnancy dating questions and combined questions, we established screening performance focusing on metrics of diagnostic accuracy, defined as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity (or the proportion of ineligible participants who correctly screened as ineligible for medication abortion), and proportion of false negatives (ie, the proportion of all participants who erroneously screened as eligible for medication abortion). We tested for differences in sensitivity across individual and combined questions using McNemar's test, and for differences in accuracy using the area under the receiver operating curve and Sidak adjusted P values. RESULTS: One-quarter (25%) of 1089 participants had a gestational duration of >70 days on ultrasound. Using the date of last menstrual period alone demonstrated 83.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 78.4-87.9) in identifying participants with gestational durations of >70 days on ultrasound, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.85) and a proportion of false negatives of 4.0%. A composite measure of responses to questions on number of weeks pregnant, date of last menstrual period, and date they got pregnant demonstrated 89.1% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 84.7-92.6) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.88), with 2.7% of false negatives. A simpler question set focused on being >10 weeks or >2 months pregnant or having missed 2 or more periods had comparable sensitivity (90.7%; 95% confidence interval, 86.6-93.9) and proportion of false negatives (2.3%), but with a slightly lower area under the receiver operating curve (0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.84). CONCLUSION: In a sample representative of people seeking abortion nationally, broadening the screening questions for assessing gestational duration beyond the date of the last menstrual period resulted in improved accuracy and sensitivity of self-assessment at the 70-day threshold for medication abortion. Ultrasound assessment for medication abortion may not be necessary, especially when requiring ultrasound could increase COVID-19 risk or healthcare costs, restrict access, or limit patient choice.
引用
收藏
页码:710.e1 / 710.e21
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of Self-Assessment of Gestational Duration Among People Seeking Abortion
    Ralph, Lauren J.
    Ehrenreich, Katherine
    Barar, Rana
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    Morris, Natalie
    Blanchard, Kelly
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Moayedi, Ghazaleh
    Perritt, Jamila
    Raymond, Elizabeth G.
    White, Kari
    Grossman, Daniel
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2022, 77 (08) : 473 - 475
  • [2] Accuracyof Self-assessment of Gestational Duration Among Adolescents Seeking Abortion Using Information in Addition to Date of Last Menstrual Period
    Ralph, Lauren
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    Ehrenreich, Katherine
    Grossman, Daniel
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2023, 177 (06) : 642 - 644
  • [3] Accuracy of Self-Assessment of Gestational Age Using Date of Last Menstrual Period
    Ehrenreich, Katherine
    Morris, Natalie
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    Grossman, Daniel
    Ralph, Lauren
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 29 (12) : A14 - A14
  • [4] Accuracy of Self-assessment Among Graduate Students in Mechanical Engineering
    Zvacek, Susan M.
    Chouzal, Maria de Fatima
    Restivo, Maria Teresa
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIVE COLLABORATIVE LEARNING (ICL), 2015, : 1130 - 1133
  • [5] Effects of self-assessment feedback on self-assessment and task-selection accuracy
    Raaijmakers, Steven F.
    Baars, Martine
    Paas, Fred
    van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G.
    van Gog, Tamara
    METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2019, 14 (01) : 21 - 42
  • [6] Effects of self-assessment feedback on self-assessment and task-selection accuracy
    Steven F. Raaijmakers
    Martine Baars
    Fred Paas
    Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
    Tamara van Gog
    Metacognition and Learning, 2019, 14 : 21 - 42
  • [7] Self-assessment accuracy and assessment centre decisions
    Randall, R
    Ferguson, E
    Patterson, F
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 73 : 443 - 459
  • [8] On test development and accuracy in self-assessment
    Hopfenbeck, Therese
    ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2015, 22 (04) : 393 - 396
  • [9] The accuracy of self-assessment by surgical trainees
    Burt, CG
    Wilkins, DC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 : 140 - 140
  • [10] A longitudinal study of self-assessment accuracy
    Fitzgerald, JT
    White, CB
    Gruppen, LD
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2003, 37 (07) : 645 - 649