Microfiltration of a dental wastewater for Hg removal: Clinic demonstration

被引:0
作者
Reed, BE [1 ]
Bagby, MD
Vaughan, RL
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[2] W Virginia Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
wastewater treatment; filtration; mercury; membranes; health care facilities;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:(12)
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hollow fiber (HF) and tubular membranes were installed at a dental clinic and used to treat dental wastewater (DWW) over a six-month period. Both membranes rejected the vast majority of the Hg (Tubular: 99% rejection and permeate Hg=20.8 mug/L; HE 97% rejection and permeate Hg=6.6 mug/L). Permeate Hg concentration and flux were not adversely affected by concentrating the DWW indicating that the system can be operated indefinitely. Biological growth blocked the openings of the HF lumens necessitating frequent maintenance. The tubular membrane with its large channel diameter (2.53 cm versus I nun for the HF) did not experience channel blockage. Given the small volume of DWW that is produced at a dental facility (approximate to3 L/d), the packing density and footprint of the membrane unit are not a major concern, thus, HF module offers no real advantage over the tubular module. Additionally, the increase maintenance that is required with the HF module is a distinct disadvantage making the tubular module better suited for dental facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 16
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
BATCHU H, 1995, J DENT RES, V74
[2]  
Cheryan M., 1998, Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook
[3]  
NALEWAY CA, 1994, J DENT RES, V73, P1
[4]  
RALLS SA, 1996, J DENT RES, V76, P1
[5]  
REED BE, 2003, ENVIRON ENG SCI, V19, P9
[6]  
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986, TEST METH EV SOL WAS, V3rd
[7]  
US Environmental Protection Agency, 1995, EPA820B95008