Development and evaluation of aperture-based complexity metrics using film and EPID measurements of static MLC openings

被引:57
作者
Gotstedt, Julia [1 ]
Hauer, Anna Karlsson [2 ]
Back, Anna [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Radiat Phys, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Therapeut Radiat Phys, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
complexity metric; quality assurance; MLC shape; aperture-based metric; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; BEAM MODULATION; PASSING RATES; IMRT; DOSIMETRY; QUALITY; IMPACT; QA;
D O I
10.1118/1.4921733
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Complexity metrics have been suggested as a complement to measurement-based quality assurance for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). However, these metrics have not yet been sufficiently validated. This study develops and evaluates new aperture-based complexity metrics in the context of static multileaf collimator (MLC) openings and compares them to previously published metrics. Methods: This study develops the converted aperture metric and the edge area metric. The converted aperture metric is based on small and irregular parts within the MLC opening that are quantified as measured distances between MLC leaves. The edge area metric is based on the relative size of the region around the edges defined by the MLC. Another metric suggested in this study is the circumference/area ratio. Earlier defined aperture-based complexity metrics-the modulation complexity score, the edge metric, the ratio monitor units (MU)/Gy, the aperture area, and the aperture irregularity-are compared to the newly proposed metrics. A set of small and irregular static MLC openings are created which simulate individual IMRT/VMAT control points of various complexities. These are measured with both an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and EBT3 film. The differences between calculated and measured dose distributions are evaluated using a pixel-by-pixel comparison with two global dose difference criteria of 3% and 5%. The extent of the dose differences, expressed in terms of pass rate, is used as a measure of the complexity of the MLC openings and used for the evaluation of the metrics compared in this study. The different complexity scores are calculated for each created static MLC opening. The correlation between the calculated complexity scores and the extent of the dose differences (pass rate) are analyzed in scatter plots and using Pearson's r-values. Results: The complexity scores calculated by the edge area metric, converted aperture metric, circumference/area ratio, edge metric, and MU/Gy ratio show good linear correlation to the complexity of the MLC openings, expressed as the 5% dose difference pass rate, with Pearson's r-values of -0.94, -0.88, -0.84, -0.89, and -0.82, respectively. The overall trends for the 3% and 5% dose difference evaluations are similar. Conclusions: New complexity metrics are developed. The calculated scores correlate to the complexity of the created static MLC openings. The complexity of the MLC opening is dependent on the penumbra region relative to the area of the opening. The aperture-based complexity metrics that combined either the distances between the MLC leaves or the MLC opening circumference with the aperture area show the best correlation with the complexity of the static MLC openings. (C) 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3911 / 3921
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
    Bland, J. Martin
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (08) : 931 - 936
  • [2] Improving IMRT delivery efficiency using intensity limits during inverse planning
    Coselmon, MM
    Moran, JM
    Radawski, JD
    Fraass, BA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (05) : 1234 - 1245
  • [3] Small fields:: Nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry
    Das, Indra J.
    Ding, George X.
    Ahnesjo, Anders
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (01) : 206 - 215
  • [4] Quantification of beam complexity in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans
    Du, Weiliang
    Cho, Sang Hyun
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Kudchadker, Rajat J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02)
  • [5] A closer look at RapidArc® radiosurgery plans using very small fields
    Fog, Lotte S.
    Rasmussen, Jens F. B.
    Aznar, Marianne
    Kjaer-Kristoffersen, Flemming
    Vogelius, Ivan R.
    Engelholm, Svend Aage
    Bangsgaard, Jens Peter
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (06) : 1853 - 1863
  • [6] Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators
    Klein, Eric E.
    Hanley, Joseph
    Bayouth, John
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Simon, William
    Dresser, Sean
    Serago, Christopher
    Aguirre, Francisco
    Ma, Lijun
    Arjomandy, Bijan
    Liu, Chihray
    Sandin, Carlos
    Holmes, Todd
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (09) : 4197 - 4212
  • [7] On the insensitivity of single field planar dosimetry to IMRT inaccuracies
    Kruse, Jon J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 2516 - 2524
  • [8] Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy
    LoSasso, T
    Chui, CS
    Ling, CC
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) : 1919 - 1927
  • [9] A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions
    Low, DA
    Harms, WB
    Mutic, S
    Purdy, JA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (05) : 656 - 661
  • [10] Impact of plan parameters on the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Masi, Laura
    Doro, Raffaela
    Favuzza, Virginia
    Cipressi, Samantha
    Livi, Lorenzo
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (07)