Digitalizing environmental governance for smallholder participation in food systems

被引：20

作者：

Kruk, Sake R. L. ^{[1
]}

Kloppenburg, Sanneke ^{[1
]}

Toonen, Hilde M. ^{[1
]}

Bush, Simon R. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Wageningen Univ, Environm Policy Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands

来源：

EARTH SYSTEM GOVERNANCE | 2021年 / 10卷

关键词：

Digitalization; Environmental governance; Participation; Smallholders; Food systems; Inclusive sustainability; BIG-DATA; CERTIFICATION; TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCE; SOVEREIGNTY; STANDARDS; ACCESS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.esg.2021.100125

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain and remote sensing are increasingly used by public and private actors to improve the participation of smallholders in addressing the environmental challenges of food production. Based on an empirical mapping of 10 digital sustainability initiatives we analyse how digital technologies shape the representations of (un)sustainable production practices, the identification of sustainability targets and intervention strategies for improving environmental performance. Based on this mapping we distinguish three archetypes of smallholder participation engendered by digital technology that we label 'the tutorial', 'the dashboard' and 'the platform'. The archetypes provide a basis for understanding how digitalization, as a process of design-based governance, can overcome, replicate or even reinforce the barriers to participation faced by analog sustainability initiatives. Applied more widely we argue this typology can provide a productive means of examining the role of digitalization in contributing to more inclusive and sustainable food systems.

引用

页数：9

共 76 条

[31]

Genius M., 2014, AM J AGR ECON, V96, P344, DOI [DOI 10.1093/AJAE/AAT054, 10.1093/ajae/aat054]

[32] Platforms Intervene [J].

Gillespie, Tarleton .

SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2015, 1 (01)

[33]

Gillespie T, 2014, INSIDE TECHNOL, P167

[34]

Goodhart C.A, 1984, Monetary Theory and Practice: The UK Experience, P91, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-17295-54, 10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5#about, DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_4]

[35] Algorithmic governance: A modes of governance approach [J].

Gritsenko, Daria ;

Wood, Matthew .

REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2022, 16 (01) :45-62

[36] Third-party certification in the global agrifood system [J].

Hatanaka, M ;

Bain, C ;

Busch, L .

FOOD POLICY, 2005, 30 (03) :354-369

[37] Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law [J].

Hildebrandt, Mireille .

PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2018, 376 (2128)

[38] The impact of agricultural interventions can be doubled by using satellite data [J].

Jain, Meha ;

Balwinder-Singh ;

Rao, Preeti ;

Srivastava, Amit K. ;

Poonia, Shishpal ;

Blesh, Jennifer ;

Azzari, George ;

McDonald, Andrew J. ;

Lobell, David B. .

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (10) :931-934

[39] "If they don't tell us what they do with it, why would we trust them?" Trust, transparency and benefit-sharing in Smart Farming [J].

Jakku, Emma ;

Taylor, Bruce ;

Fleming, Aysha ;

Mason, Claire ;

Fielke, Simon ;

Sounness, Chris ;

Thorburn, Peter .

NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2019, 90-91

[40] The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains [J].

Kamilaris, Andreas ;

Fonts, Agusti ;

Prenafeta-Boldu, Francesc X. .

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 91 :640-652

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →