Evidence-based recommendations on care for breast cancer survivors for primary care providers: a review of evidence-based breast cancer guidelines

被引:19
作者
Spronk, Inge [1 ]
Korevaar, Joke C. [1 ]
Schellevis, Francois G. [1 ,2 ]
Albreht, Tit [3 ]
Burgers, Jako S. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] NIVEL Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Syst Anal, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[4] Dutch Coll Gen Practitioners, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Sch CAPHRI, Dep Family Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; FOLLOW-UP CARE; DECISION-MAKING; LONG-TERM; QUALITY; APPRAISAL; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015118
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To review evidence-based (EB) recommendations on survivorship care for primary care providers (PCPs) in EB breast cancer guidelines. Design and setting Guidelines were collected via experts and via literature database, guideline database and cancer agency websites searches. Method EB guidelines in any language published between 2012 and 2017 were collected. EB recommendations on survivorship care relevant for PCPs were extracted and grouped into three categories (recurrence detection, long-term effects and recurrence prevention). The content of the recommendations was analysed and summarised in the number and type of clinical topics addressed. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the guidelines. Results Six guidelines, of which two were of acceptable methodological quality, were included. One was specifically made for general practitioners. Fifteen clinical topics were identified. Guidelines differed in the clinical topics addressed and for some identical topics in the content of the recommendations. Many recommendations were based on low-quality evidence. Recurrence detection received most attention, physical examination and mammography were often highlighted. Potential complications largely varied in number and type. Intimacy concerns, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, fatigue, menopausal symptoms, peripheral neuropathy and lymphedema were reported in more than one guideline. Recurrence prevention was mentioned in four guidelines; all recommended physical activity. Conclusion The number of EB recommendations in guidelines is limited. Moreover, recommendations differ between guidelines and most are based on low-quality evidence. More high-quality research is needed to develop and adapt guidelines to support PCPs in providing optimal breast cancer survivorship care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Alberta Health Services, 2015, FOLL UP CAR EARL STA
[2]  
Albrecht T, 2017, EU POLICY RECOMMENDA, P105
[3]   The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies [J].
Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;
Irfan, Affan ;
Sola, Ivan ;
Gich, Ignasi ;
Delgado-Noguera, Mario ;
Rigau, David ;
Tort, Sera ;
Bonfill, Xavier ;
Burgers, Jako ;
Schunemann, Holger .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (06) :e58
[4]  
[Anonymous], BREAST CANC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, NCI DICT CANC TERMS
[6]  
Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica, 2016, LIN GUID NEOPL MAMM, V222
[7]   A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument [J].
Brosseau, Lucie ;
Rahman, Prinon ;
Toupin-April, Karine ;
Poitras, Stephane ;
King, Judy ;
De Angelis, Gino ;
Loew, Laurianne ;
Casimiro, Lynn ;
Paterson, Gail ;
McEwan, Jessica .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01)
[8]   AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care [J].
Brouwers, Melissa C. ;
Kho, Michelle E. ;
Browman, George P. ;
Burgers, Jako S. ;
Cluzeau, Francoise ;
Feder, Gene ;
Fervers, Beatrice ;
Graham, Ian D. ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy ;
Hanna, Steven E. ;
Littlejohns, Peter ;
Makarski, Julie ;
Zitzelsberger, Louise .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (18) :E839-E842
[9]   International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation instrument [J].
Burgers, JS ;
Fervers, B ;
Haugh, M ;
Brouwers, M ;
Browman, G ;
Philip, T ;
Cluzeau, FA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (10) :2000-2007
[10]  
Cluzeau F, 2003, QUAL SAF HEALTH CARE, V12, P18