Efficacy, Acceptability, and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine, Mixed Amphetamine Salts, Methylphenidate, and Modafinil in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Stuhec, Matej [1 ,2 ]
Lukic, Petar [2 ]
Locatelli, Igor [2 ]
机构
[1] Ormoz Psychiat Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, Ptujska Cesta 33, SI-2270 Ormoz, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Pharm, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
ADHD; adults; psychostimulants; efficacy; tolerability; meta-analysis; RELEASE OROS METHYLPHENIDATE; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; EXTENDED-RELEASE; PARALLEL-GROUP; META-REGRESSION; SAFETY; ADHD; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1177/1060028018795703
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: Psychostimulants are the first-line treatment in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine (LDX), mixed amphetamine salts (MASs), modafinil (MDF), and methylphenidate (MPH) in comparison with placebo. Data Sources: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE and in May 2016, along with CENTRAL and EU Clinical Trials Register in February 2016, for the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trials conducted on adults diagnosed with ADHD. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Substantial comorbidity, substance abuse or dependence, and nonpharmacological interventions represented grounds for exclusion. Published reports were the sole source for data extraction. Improvement in ADHD symptoms was the primary outcome. Random-effects model meta-analysis was applied to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs. Data Synthesis: The search retrieved 701 records, of which 20 studies were eligible for analysis. High effect size (expressed as SMD) in reducing ADHD symptoms was observed for LDX (-0.89; 95% CI = -1.09, -0.70), whereas MASs (-0.64; 95% CI = -0.83, -0.45) and MPH (-0.50; 95% CI = -0.58, -0.41) reduced symptoms moderately compared with placebo. No efficacy was shown for MDF (0.08; 95% CI; -0.18, 0.34). Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: In this meta-analysis, the efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of psychostimulants were compared with that for placebo. Five of the included trials have not been evaluated in any of the previously published meta-analyses. Conclusions: The results suggest that LDX has the largest effect size and has a promising potential for treating adults with ADHD.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 133
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials
    Yan, Lixia
    Zhang, Junhua
    Yuan, Yang
    Cortese, Samuele
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (39)
  • [42] Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Recent Methylphenidate Use
    Rakesh Jain
    Thomas Babcock
    Teodor Burtea
    Bryan Dirks
    Ben Adeyi
    Brian Scheckner
    Robert Lasser
    John Renna
    Don Duncan
    Advances in Therapy, 2013, 30 : 472 - 486
  • [43] The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Gan, Jing
    Galer, Peter
    Ma, Dan
    Chen, Chao
    Xiong, Tao
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 29 (09) : 670 - 687
  • [44] Comparative efficacy and acceptability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis
    Hanwella, Raveen
    Senanayake, Madhri
    de Silva, Varuni
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 11
  • [45] Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fu, Binbin
    Zhou, Xiangyue
    Zhou, Xuan
    Li, Xin
    Chen, Zhengquan
    Zhang, Yanbin
    Du, Qing
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [46] Guanfacine for attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder in pediatrics: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ruggiero, Simona
    Clavenna, Antonio
    Reale, Laura
    Capuano, Annalisa
    Rossi, Francesco
    Bonati, Maurizio
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) : 1578 - 1590
  • [47] Methylphenidate for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: a narrative review
    Jaeschke, Rafal R.
    Sujkowska, Ewelina
    Sowa-Kucma, Magdalena
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 238 (10) : 2667 - 2691
  • [48] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of methylphenidate in the spontaneously hypertensive rat model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Leffa, Douglas T.
    Panzenhagen, Alana C.
    Salvi, Artur A.
    Bau, Claiton H. D.
    Pires, Gabriel N.
    Torres, Iraci L. S.
    Rohde, Luis A.
    Rovaris, Diego L.
    Grevet, Eugenio H.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2019, 100 : 166 - 179
  • [49] The Effect of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Heart Rate and Systolic Blood Pressure in Young People and Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
    Liang, Edwin F.
    Lim, Samuel Z.
    Tam, Wilson W.
    Ho, Cyrus S.
    Zhang, Melvyn W.
    McIntyre, Roger S.
    Ho, Roger C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (08)
  • [50] Pharmacogenetics of response to methylphenidate in adult patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A systematic review
    Contini, Veronica
    Rovaris, Diego L.
    Victor, Marcelo M.
    Grevet, Eugenio H.
    Rohde, Luis A.
    Bau, Claiton H. D.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 23 (06) : 555 - 560