The CUSUM test applied in prospective nuchal translucency quality review

被引:17
|
作者
Sabria, J. [1 ]
Barcelo-Vidal, C. [2 ]
Arigita, M. [3 ,4 ]
Jimenez, J. M. [3 ,4 ]
Puerto, B. [3 ,4 ]
Borrell, A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hosp St Joan de Deu, Serv Obstet & Ginecol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Barcelona 08950, Catalonia, Spain
[2] Univ Girona, Dept Comp Sci & Appl Math, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
[3] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Gynecol Obstet & Neonatol, Ultrasound Unit, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Gynecol Obstet & Neonatol, Prenatal Diag Unit, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
CUSUM; Down syndrome; nuchal translucency; prenatal screening; quality assurance; ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1002/uog.8860
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To design a cumulative sum (CUSUM) test for prospective nuchal translucency (NT) measurement quality review that is as stringent as the retrospective quality review methods based on distribution parameters currently in use. Methods The database including all fetal NT measurements obtained during a 2-year period in a single center was reviewed, and measurements obtained by sonologists who measured fewer than 100 cases were excluded. The NT distribution parameters proposed by The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) and the Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (WIHRI) were assessed in the whole NT series and in sonologist-specific distributions. A previously described CUSUM model was adapted to fulfil our objective. Results Two thousand four hundred and seventy-five NT measurements were obtained by seven sonologists during the study period (January 2007-December 2008). In the assessment of sonologist-specific NT distributions, two sonologists fulfilled all the FMF and WIHRI criteria, one showed NT overestimation and four failed due to NT underestimation. Our new CUSUM test model, based on multiples of the median deviations, showed good agreement with the FMF and WIHRI methods in the assessment of sonologist-specific performance. Conclusions Our CUSUM test model showed close agreement with the retrospective quality review methods based on distribution parameters currently in use, but with the advantage that it can be applied prospectively, allowing for earlier correction of deviations from target performance. Copyright (C) 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 587
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of nuchal translucency measurements in The Netherlands: a quantitative analysis
    Koster, M. P. H.
    Wortelboer, E. J.
    Engels, M. A. J.
    Stoutenbeek, P. H.
    Elvers, L. H.
    Visser, G. H. A.
    Schielen, P. C. J. I.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 34 (02) : 136 - 141
  • [2] Education and quality review for nuchal translucency ultrasound
    D'Alton, ME
    Cleary-Goldman, J
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2005, 29 (06) : 380 - 385
  • [3] Quality assurance of nuchal translucency for prenatal fetal Down syndrome screening
    Sahota, Daljit Singh
    Leung, Wing Cheong
    To, Wing Kee
    Chan, Wing Pan
    Lau, Tze Kin
    Leung, Tak Yeung
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (07) : 1039 - 1043
  • [4] Quality management of nuchal translucency ultrasound measurement in Australia
    Nisbet, Debbie
    Robertson, Ann
    Mannil, Blessy
    Pincham, Vanessa
    McIennan, Andrew
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [5] Quality assessment in prospective nuchal translucency screening for Down syndrome
    Wojdemann, KR
    Christiansen, M
    Sundberg, K
    Larsen, SO
    Shalmi, A
    Tabor, A
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (06) : 641 - 644
  • [6] Prospective audit of a one-centre combined nuchal translucency and triple test programme for the detection of trisomy 21
    Babbur, V
    Lees, CC
    Goodburn, SF
    Morris, N
    Breeze, ACG
    Hackett, GA
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2005, 25 (06) : 465 - 469
  • [7] The effects of maternal and fetal parameters on the quality of nuchal translucency measurement
    Zohav, E
    Dunsky, A
    Segal, O
    Peled, R
    Herman, A
    Segal, S
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (06) : 638 - 640
  • [8] Quality of nuchal translucency measurements in multifetal pregnancies
    Zohav, Efraim
    Segal, Octav
    Rabinson, Jacob
    Meltcer, Simion
    Anteby, Eyal Y.
    Orvieto, Raoul
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (10) : 663 - 666
  • [9] Maintaining quality assurance for sonographic nuchal translucency measurement: lessons from the FASTER Trial
    D'Alton, M. E.
    Cleary-Goldman, J.
    Lambert-Messerlian, G.
    Ball, R. H.
    Nyberg, D. A.
    Comstock, C. H.
    Bukowski, R.
    Berkowitz, R. L.
    Dar, P.
    Dugoff, L.
    Craigo, S. D.
    Timor, I. E.
    Carr, S. R.
    Wolfe, H. M.
    Dukes, K.
    Canick, J. A.
    Malone, F. D.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (02) : 142 - 146
  • [10] Comparison and Reproducibility of Nuchal Translucency Measurements Using Two-Dimensional and Volume Nuchal Translucency Ultrasound: A Prospective Study
    Van Keirsbilck, Joachim
    Dewulf, Veerle
    Van Calsteren, Kristel
    De Catte, Luc
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2013, 34 (02) : 103 - 109