Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy

被引:46
作者
Crook, Tim J. [1 ]
Lockyer, C. R. [1 ]
Keoghane, Stephen R. [1 ]
Walmsley, Byron H. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Hosp, Solent Dept Urol, Portsmouth PO3 6AD, Hants, England
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2006.0034
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To establish if totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a safe management technique. PCNL is a well-established option for upper tract stones. The procedure traditionally concludes with the placement of a nephrostomy drainage tube but in those patients in whom there has been minimal blood loss and complete stone clearance, it may not be necessary to place a nephrostomy. Patients and Methods: Totally tubeless PCNL was performed in uncomplicated cases, when there was no significant bleeding or residual stone load, an intact pelvicaliceal system, and no evidence of a residual ureteral stone. Results: 100 procedures were analyzed during a 10-year period from 1996 to 2006. The mean stone size was 15.9 mm (range 7-40 mm). Mean residual stone load was 1.74 mm (range 1-10 mm). Access was considered difficult in 2%. Transfusion rate was 1% with a mean fall in hemoglobin of 1.4 g/dL ([-0.4] - [+5.6] g/dL), and a mean rise in creatinine level of 0.3 mu mol/L ([-43] - [+52] mu mol/L). The minor sepsis rate was 5%, and the major sepsis rate was 1%. The readmission rate was 1%. The mean length of stay was 2.9 days (range 1-10 d). Secondary treatment was required in 5%, and stone clearance rate at 3 months was 90%. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that PCNL without nephrostomy or stent is a safe and well-tolerated procedure in selected patients. It is the authors' belief that totally tubeless PCNL may be considered an accepted standard of care for selected patients, and it is possible to reserve placement of a nephrostomy tube or internal ureteral stent for specific indications.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 271
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Use of Surgicel for sealing nephrostomy tract after totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Aghamir, S. M. K. ;
Khazaeli, M. H. ;
Meisami, A. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (05) :293-295
[2]   Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Aghamir, SMK ;
Hosseini, SR ;
Gooran, S .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 (07) :647-648
[3]  
[Anonymous], BR J UROL
[4]   Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery [J].
Bellman, GC ;
Davidoff, R ;
Candela, J ;
Gerspach, J ;
Kurtz, S ;
Stout, L .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (05) :1578-1582
[5]  
Cooke D A, 1986, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V31, P192
[6]   Safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous nephrostolithotomy [J].
Delnay, KM ;
Wake, RW .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 16 (06) :375-377
[7]   A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: Large bore versus small bore versus tubeless [J].
Desai, MR ;
Kukreja, RA ;
Desai, MM ;
Mhaskar, SS ;
Wani, KA ;
Patel, SH ;
Bapat, SD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (02) :565-567
[8]   PERCUTANEOUS PYELOLITHOTOMY - NEW EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE [J].
FERNSTROM, I ;
JOHANSSON, B .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1976, 10 (03) :257-259
[9]   Almost totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Further evolution of the technique [J].
Goh, M ;
Wolf, JS .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (03) :177-180
[10]   Tubeless and stentless percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Gupta, V ;
Sadasukhi, TC ;
Sharma, KK ;
Yadav, RG ;
Mathur, R .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (06) :905-906