Risk Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery Among Women Undergoing Induction of Labor

被引:33
作者
Rossi, Robert M.
Requarth, Erin
Warshak, Carri R.
Dufendach, Kevin R.
Hall, Eric S.
DeFranco, Emily A.
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Informat, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[4] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Perinatal Inst, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
关键词
BISHOP SCORE; ELECTIVE INDUCTION; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000003696
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a predictive risk calculator for cesarean delivery among women undergoing induction of labor. METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study of all women who had singleton live births after undergoing induction of labor from 32 0/7 to 42 6/7 weeks of gestation in the United States from 2012 to 2016. The primary objective was to build a predictive model estimating the probability of cesarean delivery after induction of labor using antenatal factors obtained from de-identified U.S. live-birth records. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association of these factors on risk of cesarean delivery. K-fold cross validation was performed for internal validation of the model, followed by external validation using a separate live-birth cohort from 2017. A publicly available online calculator was developed after validation and calibration were performed for individual risk assessment. The seven variables selected for inclusion in the model by magnitude of influence were prior vaginal delivery, maternal weight at delivery, maternal height, maternal age, prior cesarean delivery, gestational age at induction, and maternal race. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2016, there were 19,844,580 live births in the United States, of which 4,177,644 women with singleton gestations underwent induction of labor. Among these women, 800,423 (19.2%) delivered by cesarean. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the seven-variable model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.787 (95% CI 0.786-0.788). External validation demonstrated a consistent measure of discrimination with an AUC of 0.783 (95% CI 0.764-0.802). CONCLUSION: This validated predictive model uses seven variables that were obtainable from the patient's medical record and discriminates between women at increased or decreased risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. This risk calculator, found at , can be used in addition to the Bishop score by health care providers in counseling women who are undergoing an induction of labor and allocating appropriate resources for women at high risk for cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 568
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, PRACT DIV CLIN GUID
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, Obstet Gynecol, V123, P693, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003 REV US STAND CE
  • [4] Preinduction cervical assessment
    Baacke, Keri A.
    Edwards, Rodney K.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (03) : 564 - 572
  • [5] Factors predicting labor induction success: A critical analysis
    Crane, Joan M. G.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (03) : 573 - 584
  • [6] Outcomes of Elective Labour Induction and Elective Caesarean Section in Low-risk Pregnancies Between 37 and 41 Weeks' Gestation
    Dunne, Caitlin
    Da Silva, Orlando
    Schmidt, Gail
    Natale, Renato
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2009, 31 (12) : 1124 - 1130
  • [7] Measures of success: Prediction of successful labor induction
    Gibson, Kelly S.
    Waters, Thaddeus P.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 475 - 482
  • [8] Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
    Grobman, William A.
    Lai, Yinglei
    Landon, Mark B.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Moawad, Atef H.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Harper, Margaret
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    Carpenter, Marshall
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Langer, Oded
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04) : 806 - 812
  • [9] Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies
    Grobman, William A.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (04) : 304 - 310
  • [10] Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women
    Grobman, William A.
    Rice, Madeline M.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Mallett, Gail
    Hill, Kim
    Thom, Elizabeth A.
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Perez-Delboy, Annette
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Saade, George R.
    Boggess, Kim A.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Iams, Jay D.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Macones, George A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (06) : 513 - 523