Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammography and Breast Ultrasound During Pregnancy and Lactation

被引:68
作者
Robbins, Jessica [2 ]
Jeffries, Deborah [1 ]
Roubidoux, Marilyn [1 ]
Helvie, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Hosp & Clin, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
breast; lactation; mammography; pregnancy; ultrasound; CANCER;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.09.3662
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to determine the accuracy of mammography and sonography in evaluating pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed diagnostic breast imaging examinations of 155 pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women with 164 lesions presenting to our breast imaging department from 2004 to 2005. Records were reviewed for clinical presentation, reported sonographic or mammographic findings with BI-RADS assessment, histologic results, and clinical outcomes. Examinations rated as BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were considered positive. One hundred thirty-four (82%) of 164 lesions had pathology results available or longer than 12 months follow-up in our study group. Of these lesions, 12 (9%) were evaluated by mammography alone, 49 (37%) were evaluated by ultrasound alone, and 73 (54%) were evaluated by both techniques. RESULTS. Of 134 lesions, 87 (65%) were in patients who presented during lactation, 34 (25%) who presented during pregnancy, and 13 (10%) who presented postpartum. The presenting symptom for 86 lesions (64%) was a palpable mass. Biopsies were performed for 40 lesions. Of these lesions, four were malignant and 36 were benign. Mammograms were dense or heterogeneously dense in 88% of patients. All four malignancies were BI-RADS category 4 or 5 according to both mammography and ultrasound. For the 85 lesions evaluated with mammography, there was 100% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 40% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. For the 122 lesions evaluated with sonography, there was 100% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 19% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION. Among lactating and pregnant women, both mammography and sonography had a negative predictive value of 100% and accurately revealed the few cancers that were present in our study group.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 722
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Lapses in breast cancer screening for highly penetrant mutation carriers during pregnancy and lactation [J].
Chichura, Anna ;
Hunt, Jonathan ;
Lang, Julie ;
Pederson, Holly .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 125 (04) :589-595
[42]   Anatomy and Physiology of the Breast during Pregnancy and Lactation [J].
Alex, Ashley ;
Bhandary, Eva ;
McGuire, Kandace P. .
DISEASES OF THE BREAST DURING PREGNANCY AND LACTATION, 2020, 1252 :3-7
[43]   Breast Imaging and Intervention during Pregnancy and Lactation [J].
Peterson, Molly S. ;
Gegios, Alison R. ;
Elezaby, Mai A. ;
Salkowski, Lonie R. ;
Woods, Ryan W. ;
Narayan, Anand K. ;
Strigel, Roberta M. ;
Roy, Madhuchhanda ;
Fowler, Amy M. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2023, 43 (10)
[44]   Accuracy of Tumor Size Measurements During Mammography and Breast Ultrasonography in Breast Cancer Patients [J].
Oprea, Adela-Luciana ;
Georgescu, Rares ;
Ionescu, Paul ;
Marginean, Claudiu .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH CONGRESS OF THE ULTRASOUND SOCIETY IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY / 34TH FETUS AS A PATIENT INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS, 2018, :409-416
[45]   Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Suter, Matteo Basilio ;
Pesapane, Filippo ;
Agazzi, Giorgio Maria ;
Gagliardi, Tania ;
Nigro, Olga ;
Bozzini, Anna ;
Priolo, Francesca ;
Penco, Silvia ;
Cassano, Enrico ;
Chini, Claudio ;
Squizzato, Alessandro .
BREAST, 2020, 53 :8-17
[46]   Diagnostic test accuracy of AI-assisted mammography for breast imaging: a narrative review [J].
Dave, Daksh ;
Akhunzada, Adnan ;
Ivkovic, Nikola ;
Gyawali, Sujan ;
Cengiz, Korhan ;
Ahmed, Adeel ;
Al-Shamayleh, Ahmad Sami .
PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2025, 11
[47]   Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and mammography for breast cancer [J].
Zhang, Yueqiao ;
Ren, Hong .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 13 (05) :862-868
[48]   The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnancy [J].
Baruch, Yoav ;
Canetti, Michal ;
Blecher, Yair ;
Yogev, Yariv ;
Grisaru, Dan ;
Michaan, Nadav .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (23) :3929-3934
[49]   Diagnostic performance of mammography and ultrasound in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Tadesse, Getu Ferenji ;
Tegaw, Eyachew Misganew ;
Abdisa, Ejigu Kebede .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND, 2023, 26 (02) :355-367
[50]   Diagnostic performance of mammography and ultrasound in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Getu Ferenji Tadesse ;
Eyachew Misganew Tegaw ;
Ejigu Kebede Abdisa .
Journal of Ultrasound, 2023, 26 :355-367