Electronic search programs are effective in identifying patients with minimal trauma fractures

被引:6
作者
Blaker, K. [1 ]
Wijewardene, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
White, E. [2 ]
Stokes, G. [4 ]
Chong, S. [1 ]
Ganda, K. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Ridley, L. [3 ,6 ]
Brown, S. [7 ]
White, C. [4 ]
Clifton-Bligh, R. [2 ,3 ]
Seibel, M. J. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
[2] Royal North Shore Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[5] ANZAC Res Inst, Bone Res Program, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
[6] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
[7] Abbot Diagnost, Macquarie Pk, NSW 2113, Australia
关键词
Electronic search tools; Fracture liaison service; Health informatics; Minimal trauma fracture; Natural language processing; Osteoporosis; LIAISON SERVICE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; IDENTIFICATION; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-021-06105-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We assessed two electronic search tools that screen medical records for documented fractures. Both programs reliably identified patients with any fracture but missed individuals with minimal trauma fracture to different degrees. A hybrid tool combining the methodology of both tools is likely to improve the identification of those with osteoporosis. Purpose Most patients who suffer a minimal trauma fracture remain undiagnosed, placing them at high risk of refracture. Case finding can be improved by electronic search tools that screen medical records for documented fractures. Here, we assessed the efficacy of two new programs, AES and XRAIT, in identifying patients with minimal trauma fracture. Methods Each tool was applied to search the electronic medical record and/or radiology reports at two tertiary hospitals in Sydney, Australia, from 1 July to 31 December 2018. Samples of the extracted reports were then manually reviewed to determine the sensitivity of each program in detecting minimal trauma fractures. Results At the two centers, AES detected 872 and 1364 cases, whereas XRAIT identified 1414 and 2180 patients with fractures, respectively. The true positive rate for "any fracture" was similar for both instruments (77-88%). However, the ability to detect "minimal trauma fractures" differed between programs and centers (53-75% accuracy), with each tool identifying separate subsets of patients. Concordance between both tools was less than half of the combined total number of minimal trauma fractures (43-45%). Considering the total number of minimal trauma fractures detected by both tools combined, AES correctly identified 52-55% of cases while XRAIT identified 88-93% of cases. Conclusion Both programs reliably identified patients with any fracture but missed individuals with minimal trauma fracture to different degrees. Hybrid tools combining the methodology of XRAIT and AES are likely to improve the identification of patients who require investigation and treatment for osteoporosis.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 441
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Agency ADH, 2020, SNOMED CT
[2]   Closing the Osteoporosis Care Gap [J].
Akesson, Kristina E. ;
McGuigan, Fiona E. A. .
CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2021, 19 (01) :58-65
[3]  
Authority IHP, 2019, ICD10AMACHIACS AUTH
[4]   The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review [J].
Barton, David W. ;
Piple, Amit S. ;
Smith, C. Taylor ;
Moskal, Sterling A. ;
Carmouche, Jonathan J. .
GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2021, 12
[5]   Rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment following vertebral fracture [J].
Barton, David W. ;
Behrend, Caleb J. ;
Carmouche, Jonathan J. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (03) :411-417
[6]   Number, Location, and Time Since Prior Fracture as Predictors of Future Fracture in the Elderly From the General Population [J].
Beaudoin, Claudia ;
Jean, Sonia ;
Moore, Lynne ;
Gamache, Philippe ;
Bessette, Louis ;
Ste-Marie, Louis-Georges ;
Brown, Jacques P. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2018, 33 (11) :1956-1966
[7]   Cost-effectiveness of the Concord Minimal Trauma Fracture Liaison service, a prospective, controlled fracture prevention study [J].
Cooper, M. S. ;
Palmer, A. J. ;
Seibel, M. J. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 (01) :97-107
[8]   Persistence with osteoporosis treatment in patients from the Lille University Hospital Fracture Liaison Service [J].
Delbar, Anthony ;
Pflimlin, Arnaud ;
Delabriere, Isabelle ;
Ternynck, Camille ;
Chantelot, Christophe ;
Puisieux, Francois ;
Cortet, Bernard ;
Paccou, Julien .
BONE, 2021, 144
[9]   Automatic Retrieval of Bone Fracture Knowledge Using Natural Language Processing [J].
Do, Bao H. ;
Wu, Andrew S. ;
Maley, Joan ;
Biswal, Sandip .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (04) :709-713
[10]   Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention [J].
Eisman, John A. ;
Bogoch, Earl R. ;
Dell, Rick ;
Harrington, J. Timothy ;
McKinney, Ross E., Jr. ;
McLellan, Alastair ;
Mitchell, Paul J. ;
Silverman, Stuart ;
Singleton, Rick ;
Siris, Ethel .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2012, 27 (10) :2039-2046