Obesity and oral contraceptive failure: Findings from the 2002 national survey of family growth

被引:37
作者
Huber, Larissa R. Brunner [1 ]
Toth, Jessica L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
关键词
contraceptives; oral; obesity; women's health;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwm221
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Oral contraceptives are the most popular reversible method of contraception in the United States. Although most women using oral contraceptives are reliably protected against pregnancy, nearly half of the 3 million unintended pregnancies in the United States annually occur among the 90% of women who use contraception. Recent findings suggest that obesity may reduce the biologic effectiveness of oral contraceptives. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the potential obesity-oral contraceptive failure association using 2002 National Survey of Family Growth data. In this retrospective cohort of 1,491 women, body mass index (kg/m(2)) was derived from self-reported values, and oral contraceptive failure was defined as conceptions that occurred while women used oral contraceptives. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from Cox proportional hazards models. Obese women (body mass index >= 30 vs. 18.5-24.9) had an increased risk of oral contraceptive failure (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 0.94, 2.68). Results were largely attenuated after adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, and parity. This population-based study found no association between obesity and oral contraceptive failure. While it is possible that misclassification or uncontrolled confounding obscured a true relation, it may be that there is no association. Large, prospective studies are needed to assess whether obesity plays a biologically relevant role in oral contraceptive effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:1306 / 1311
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Report of a WHO Expert Consultation
[2]   Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs an oral contraceptive - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Audet, MC ;
Moreau, M ;
Koltun, WD ;
Waldbaum, AS ;
Shangold, G ;
Fisher, AC ;
Creasy, GW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (18) :2347-2354
[3]  
Bolúmar F, 2000, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V151, P1072, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010150
[4]  
Brown SarahS., 1995, The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families
[5]   The role of body weight in oral contraceptive failure: Results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth [J].
Brunner, LR ;
Hogue, CJ .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (07) :492-499
[6]   BIAS FROM NONDIFFERENTIAL MISCLASSIFICATION IN CASE-CONTROL STUDIES WITH 3 EXPOSURE LEVELS [J].
CORREAVILLASENOR, A ;
STEWART, WF ;
FRANCOMARINA, F ;
SEACAT, H .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 6 (03) :276-281
[7]   THE ABILITY OF WOMEN TO RECALL THEIR ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE HISTORIES [J].
COULTER, A ;
VESSEY, M ;
MCPHERSON, K ;
CROSSLEY, B .
CONTRACEPTION, 1986, 33 (02) :127-137
[8]   A 10-year follow-up study of contraceptive Norplant implants [J].
Du, MK ;
Chow, LP ;
Zheng, HM ;
Chen, CHC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2000, 68 (03) :249-256
[9]   Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in women: An integrative review of the literature [J].
Engstrom, JL ;
Paterson, SA ;
Doherty, A ;
Trabulsi, M ;
Speer, KL .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2003, 48 (05) :338-345
[10]   Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001 [J].
Finer, Larence B. ;
Henshaw, Stanley K. .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2006, 38 (02) :90-96