Contact pheromones mediate male preference in black widow spiders: avoidance of hungry sexual cannibals?

被引:46
作者
Baruffaldi, Luciana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Andrade, Maydianne C. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Integrat Behaviour & Neurosci Grp, Scarborough, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
[2] Inst Invest Biol Clemente Estab, Lab Etol Ecol & Evoluc, Montevideo, Uruguay
[3] Fac Ciencias, Secc Entomol, Montevideo, Uruguay
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
female dietary condition; Latrodectus hasselti; Latrodectus hesperus; male discrimination; mating risk; pheromone extract; silk production; MALE MATE CHOICE; ORB-WEB SPIDER; HASSELTI THORELL ARANEAE; CHEMICAL SIGNALS; STAGMOMANTIS-LIMBATA; SPERM COMPETITION; REDBACK SPIDER; MALE SACRIFICE; FEMALE; THERIDIIDAE;
D O I
10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Males often exercise mate choice when mating frequency is constrained, costs of choice are low and variation in female quality and/or expected paternity can be reliably detected. Across invertebrates, males use sex pheromones to discern female mating status, but there are few demonstrations that information about expected fecundity ('quality') is encoded in pheromones alone. Here we examine whether females' sex pheromones allow males to detect differences in female food intake and mass in two species of widow spiders (Latrodectus hesperus and Latrodectus hasselti) in which chemicals are deposited by females in silk. Recent work shows that male L. hesperus prefer well-fed females, and that these females produce more silk than hungry females. Thus, changes in diet could be mechanistically linked to changes in silk-bound pheromonal signals. We show that unmated females of both species lose more than half of their mass when food is withheld, and silk production is reduced by 48% (L. hesperus) to 67% (L. hasselti). Males had a significant sexual response to pheromones extracted from the females' silk in both species, although this response was not directly correlated with silk or female mass. In L. hesperus, but not in L. hasselti, males were less responsive to sex pheromones from food-deprived females compared to well-fed females. While females on good diets provide the benefit of higher fecundity in both species, the risk of being cannibalized by hungry females during courtship exists only in L. hesperus. We conclude that sex pheromones alone can provide information about recent female feeding history, possibly reducing the costs of males expressing choice in the field. The species difference in male response also suggests that male preferences in these spiders may depend less on the benefit of seeking a highly fecund female and more on avoiding the cost of risky mating attempts with a likely cannibal. (C) 2015 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 32
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Mate location and antennal morphology in the praying mantid Hierodula majuscula [J].
Allen, Louise E. ;
Barry, Katherine L. ;
Holwell, Gregory I. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2012, 51 :133-140
[2]  
Andersson Malte, 1994
[3]   Terminal investment strategies and male mate choice: Extreme tests of Bateman [J].
Andrade, MCB ;
Kasumovic, MM .
INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (05) :838-847
[4]   Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian redback spider [J].
Andrade, MCB .
SCIENCE, 1996, 271 (5245) :70-72
[5]   Risky mate search and male self-sacrifice in redback spiders [J].
Andrade, MCB .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2003, 14 (04) :531-538
[6]   Female hunger can explain variation in cannibalistic behavior despite male sacrifice in redback spiders [J].
Andrade, MCB .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1998, 9 (01) :33-42
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, THESIS U TORONTO TOR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste
[9]  
Arnqvist Goran, 2005, pUnpaginated
[10]   Influence of female nutritional status on mating dynamics in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantid [J].
Barry, K. L. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2010, 80 (03) :405-411