Reproducibility of measurements of hepatic artery and portal vein diameter and flow velocity in paediatricliver transplant recipients

被引:5
作者
Humphrey, Terry
Bainbridge, Constance
Stringer, Mark
机构
[1] St James Univ Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
[2] St James Univ Hosp, Childrens Liver & Gi Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
liver; transplantation; ultrasound; measurement; blood flow; children;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-007-0509-y
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Hepatic blood flow is critical for successful liver transplantation. To reliably calculate flow, vessel cross-sectional area and mean flow velocities must be reproducibly measurable. Objective To assess the reproducibility of sonographic measurements of portal vein (PV) and hepatic artery (HA) diameters and mean flow velocities in children after transplantation. Materials and methods Ten children were scanned by two operators 5 or 7 days after transplantation. Each scanned the same patient twice measuring the diameter and the time-averaged velocity (TAV) in the PV and HA. Operators were blinded to all measurements. Agreement and repeatability were analysed statistically. Results The interobserver variation in PV and HA diameters and TAVs were expressed as mean differences between operators and plotted against the mean value for each. This showed relatively poor agreement for PV diameter (mean difference 1.23 +/- 0.96 mm), but better agreement for HA diameter (mean difference 0.18 +/- 0.6 mm). Intraobserver differences were of similar magnitude. TAVs showed better agreement and repeatability. Conclusion This study demonstrates substantial inter- and intraobserver variation in sonographic measurements of vessel diameters and TAV after paediatric liver transplantation. Estimates of volume of blood flow to the transplant derived from these measurements are poorly reproducible.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 817
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]   Change in portal flow after liver transplantation: Effect on hepatic arterial resistance indices and role of spleen size [J].
Bolognesi, M ;
Sacerdoti, D ;
Bombonato, G ;
Merkel, C ;
Sartori, G ;
Merenda, R ;
Nava, V ;
Angeli, P ;
Feltracco, P ;
Gatta, A .
HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 35 (03) :601-608
[3]   Changes in portal vein flow after adult living-donor liver transplantation:: Does it influence postoperative liver function? [J].
García-Valdecasas, JC ;
Fuster, J ;
Charco, R ;
Bombuy, E ;
Fondevila, C ;
Ferrer, J ;
Ayuso, C ;
Taura, P .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (06) :564-569
[4]  
PAYEN DM, 1990, SURGERY, V107, P417
[5]   Intraoperative measurement of graft blood flow - A necessity in liver transplantation [J].
Rasmussen, A ;
Hjortrup, A ;
Kirkegaard, P .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 10 (01) :74-77
[6]   Hemodynamic interaction between portal vein and hepatic artery flow in small-for-size split liver transplantation [J].
Smyrniotis, V ;
Kostopanagiotou, G ;
Kondi, A ;
Gamaletsos, E ;
Theodoraki, K ;
Kehagias, D ;
Mystakidou, K ;
Contis, J .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 15 (07) :355-360
[7]   Prospective evaluation of the role of quantitative Doppler ultrasound surveillance in liver transplantation [J].
Stell, D ;
Downey, D ;
Marotta, P ;
Solano, E ;
Khakhar, A ;
Quan, D ;
Ghent, C ;
McAlister, V ;
Wall, W .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (09) :1183-1188
[8]  
STRINGER MD, 2002, SURG LIVER BILEDUCTS, P441
[9]  
THRUSH A, 2003, DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUN, P113