Risk assessment and profit sharing in business networks

被引:23
作者
Lo Nigro, Giovanna [1 ]
Abbate, Lorenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, DTMPIG, I-90133 Palermo, Italy
关键词
Network organization forms; Network risk; Profit sharing; Shapley value; CAPM; MANAGEMENT; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.08.014
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Nowadays network is the preferred governance form to conduct economic transactions. Network solution allows to reach flexibility maintaining cost and quality level. Since network concept refers to a great variety of organizational hybrids it is possible to choose the one that fits better market requirements. The new trends in inter-organization relationships push towards network solutions: companies are interested in relationships with partners and customers to overcome resource dependence, to enter too risky market or simply differentiate their business portfolio. The proposed research focuses on the network concept aiming at highlighting threats and opportunities to investigate the double nature of the risk concept. Network structures offer flexibility and higher profit as a consequence and business risk sharing opportunity. These two aspects (profit and risk) are strictly related and have to be considered together to depict a complete scenario: this implies that risk assessment and management in network environment cannot neglect profit sharing or, in other words, that profit sharing mechanisms should use risk as driver. In this context our research proposes a methodology to measure risk taking into account network peculiarities; risk estimation is a basic step to evaluate the opportunity cost of capital needed to compute the network Net Present Value (NPV) that is assumed as base in the profit sharing process. The profit sharing process has been tackled using the Shapley value approach that is inspired to the fairness principle while the opportunity cost of capital is assessed using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 241
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Incentive profit-sharing rules joined with open-book accounting in SME networks [J].
Jarimo, T. ;
Kulmala, H. I. .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2008, 19 (05) :508-517
[32]   Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing [J].
Krajewska, M. A. ;
Kopfer, H. ;
Laporte, G. ;
Ropke, S. ;
Zaccour, G. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2008, 59 (11) :1483-1491
[33]   CONTRIBUTION-BASED PROFIT-SHARING SCHEME FOR JOINT VENTURES [J].
Hsueh, Sung-Lin ;
Yan, Min-Ren .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2011, 17 (03) :445-458
[34]   Knowledge Sharing Mechanisms in Business Networks of SMEs: Findings from an Empirical Study [J].
Unhale, Manish ;
Taticchi, Paolo .
IFKAD 2014: 9TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT MODELS FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, 2014, :1136-1147
[35]   Services to Support Knowledge Sharing in Complex Business Networks, Big Data as the Source [J].
Ali, Abdussalam ;
Hawryszkiewycz, Igor .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (ICICKM 2014), 2014, :476-484
[36]   Capability Assessment toward Sustainable Development of Business Incubators: Framework and Experience Sharing [J].
Gerdsri, Nathasit ;
Iewwongcharoen, Boonkiart ;
Rajchamaha, Kittichai ;
Manotungvorapun, Nisit ;
Pongthanaisawan, Jakapong ;
Witthayaweerasak, Watcharin .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (09)
[37]   Asset pricing implications of firms' profit sharing [J].
Bae, Jaewan ;
Kang, Jangkoo .
PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 84
[38]   Profit sharing and strike activity in Cournot oligopoly [J].
Ana Mauleon ;
Vincent J. Vannetelbosch .
Journal of Economics, 1999, 69 :19-40
[39]   On pricing and profit sharing of executive human capital [J].
Yan, QX ;
Zhao, Y .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES AND GLOBAL STRATEGIES IN THE 21ST CENTURY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, :1797-1802
[40]   Debt burden, investment, and profit-sharing [J].
Kenshiro Ninomiya .
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 2023, 20 :287-306