Do energy audits help SMEs to realize energy-efficiency opportunities?

被引:39
作者
Kalantzis, F. [1 ]
Revoltella, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] European Investment Bank, Dept Econ, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
关键词
Energy audit; Propensity score matching; Energy efficiency; EIBIS; BARRIERS; CONSERVATION; INVESTMENT; INNOVATION; ADOPTION; PROGRAM; TECHNOLOGIES; SUBSIDIES; DECISION; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2019.07.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper contributes to the understanding of the determinants of energy audits and to the role of energy audits in promoting energy-efficiency measures in SMEs. It benefits from the data collected within the European Investment Bank Surveys in 2017 and 2018, involving information about energy audits and energy-efficiency investments of some 12,500 signatures from EU28 Member States per year. Our analysis suggests that the decision of firms to conduct an energy audit is driven mainly by their characteristics, such as size, productivity, capital intensity, sector affiliation, and national policies regarding the transposition of relevant EU legislation and policy incentives. Furthermore, our findings indicate that energy audits besides being the first step in realizing energy-efficiency opportunities, most likely lead to the adoption of their recommendations. This is consistent with the view that energy audit is a useful tool in overcoming the information barriers and facilitating investments in energy-efficiency measures (EEMs). In fact, their information is more crucial for small firms and for investments in support processes such as lighting, wall insulation etc. than in production processes such as replacement of machinery and equipment. We also find that the likelihood of investments in EEMs, especially after an energy audit, is higher when combined with external financing and for innovative firms. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 239
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany
    Almus, M
    Czarnitzki, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2003, 21 (02) : 226 - 236
  • [2] Information programs for technology adoption: the case of energy-efficiency audits
    Anderson, ST
    Newell, RG
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (01) : 27 - 50
  • [3] Factors underlying the investment decision in energy-saving systems in Dutch horticulture
    Aramyan, Lusine H.
    Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. Oude
    Verstegen, Jos A. A. M.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 94 (02) : 520 - 527
  • [4] The effectiveness of government promotion of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMT): An economic analysis based on Swiss micro data
    Arvanitis, S
    Hollenstein, H
    Lenz, S
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2002, 19 (04) : 321 - 340
  • [5] The effectiveness of US energy efficiency building labels (vol 2, 17033, 2017)
    Asensio, Omar Isaac
    Delmas, Magali A.
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2017, 2 (04):
  • [6] Sustainable renovation of residential buildings and the landlord/tenant dilemma
    Astmarsson, Bjorn
    Jensen, Per Anker
    Maslesa, Esmir
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 : 355 - 362
  • [7] Impact after three years of the Swedish energy audit program
    Backlund, Sandra
    Thollander, Patrik
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 82 : 54 - 60
  • [8] Extending the energy efficiency gap
    Backlund, Sandra
    Thollander, Patrik
    Palm, Jenny
    Ottosson, Mikael
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 : 392 - 396
  • [9] The impact of energy audits on energy efficiency investment of public owners. Evidence from Italy
    Barbetta, Gian Paolo
    Canino, Paolo
    Cima, Stefano
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 93 : 1199 - 1209
  • [10] Energy performance of fishing vessels and potential savings
    Basurko, Oihane C.
    Gabina, Gorka
    Uriondo, Zigor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 54 : 30 - 40