Achieving organizational resilience through complex adaptive systems approach: a conceptual framework

被引:8
作者
Akpinar, Hatice [1 ]
Ozer-Caylan, Didem [2 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ Surmene, Fac Marine Sci, Dept Maritime Business Management, Trabzon, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Maritime Fac, Dept Maritime Business Adm, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Organizational resilience; Complex adaptive systems (CAS) approach; Systematic literature review; Conceptual model; SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE; DECISION-MAKING; CHAOS THEORY; MANAGEMENT; CAPABILITIES; CAPACITY; MODEL; PERSPECTIVE; MITIGATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1108/MRJIAM-01-2022-1265
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The global business environment causes different and difficult kinds of problems that threaten organizational survival. As an important solution, the organizational resilience concept arises and offers holistic philosophy. The resilience concept offers multidisciplinary and valuable eclectic literature to organizational studies that help to produce a wide variety of solutions but causes a lack of consensus to measure and apply resilience at an organizational level. To fill this gap, this paper aims to offer the complex adaptive systems (CAS) approach as a lens to organizations. This paper aims to offer that CAS provides a suitable toolkit to address the organizational resilience concept as it has the potential to offer more generalizable guidance. Design/methodology/approach To reach that goal, this research follows a two-phase systematic literature review. In the first phase, the purpose is to search past five years' studies (2015-2020) to figure out current trends in organizational resilience concepts. In the second phase, organizational resilience studies, which include the CAS approach, are checked to analyze the alignment procedures of two concepts. Findings Literature shows that the organizational resilience concept has rarely worked from the CAS lens.CAS are more resilient via adaptation and learning as they depend on local interactions that shape and co-evolve together with their dynamic environment, which helps the emergence of self-organization in an unpredictable future. To achieve organizational resilience, the CAS lens proposes a generalizable and applicable framework to organizational studies. Research limitations/implications Future research should also explore the impact of the interrelationship between two concepts; quantitative and qualitative methods should be applied to be able to get empirical results. Practical implications CAS lens could be used as a contemporary design idea. The CAS approach enables the learning and adaptation requirement of the organizational resilience concept, which helps to create dynamic capabilities to handle turbulent changes and gain long-lasting competitiveness. Designing organizations' agents from CAS viewpoint helps to understand and be ready for new trends, such as digitalization or Industry 4.0. Social implications Evaluating organizations from the CAS lens as living systems that co-evolve with their environments reveals different ways to achieve organizational resilience management philosophy. Designing organizations as CAS promotes organizational adaptation and learning, which improves organizational decision-making, increasing organizational resilience in organizations. Originality/value The originality of the study lies in proposing to achieve organizational resilience via CAS lenses and offering a conceptual framework to achieve organizational resilience.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 309
页数:21
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]   Supply chain resilience: a multi-level framework [J].
Adobor, Henry .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 22 (06) :533-556
[2]   Organisational resilience capacity and firm product innovativeness and performance [J].
Akgun, Ali E. ;
Keskin, Halit .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (23) :6918-6937
[3]  
Akpinar H., 2021, THESIS DOKUZ EYLUL U
[4]   Where is supply chain resilience research heading? A systematic and co-occurrence analysis [J].
Ali, Imran ;
Golgeci, Ismail .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 49 (08) :793-815
[5]  
Allen Peter., 2011, The Sage handbook of complexity and management, P164
[6]   Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions [J].
Annarelli, Alessandro ;
Nonino, Fabio .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 62 :1-18
[7]   What Is Resilience and How Can It Be Nurtured? A Systematic Review of Empirical Literature on Organizational Resilience [J].
Barasa, Edwine ;
Mbau, Rahab ;
Gilson, Lucy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 7 (06) :491-503
[8]  
Barroso A., 2015, APPL CONT MANAGEMENT, DOI [10.5772/59580 10.5772/59580, DOI 10.5772/59580]
[9]  
Baumann O., 2015, Mind Society, V14, P169, DOI [10.1007/s11299-015-0168-x, DOI 10.1007/S11299-015-0168-X]
[10]   Methodological strategies in resilient health care studies: An integrative review [J].
Berg, Siv Hilde ;
Akerjordet, Kristin ;
Ekstedt, Mirjam ;
Aase, Karina .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 110 :300-312