Exploring turn-taking patterns during dialogic collaborative problem solving

被引:11
作者
Hu, Liru [1 ]
Chen, Gaowei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Educ, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
关键词
Turn-taking; Collaborative problem solving; Pattern; Participation shift; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; ONLINE; DISCOURSE; COMMUNICATION; THINKING; SUPPORT; SCRIPT; ROLES; ORDER;
D O I
10.1007/s11251-021-09565-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated students' turn-taking patterns during dialogic collaborative problem solving, with analysis based on the participation-shift analytical framework. 168 primary fourth-grade students were assigned to 42 groups and worked on three mathematical problems for a total of 30 minutes. Group-level analysis revealed that most students accessed the conversational floor by receiving it from the last speaker. Usurping a floor offered to another person and claiming a floor opened to the whole group were positively associated with the intensity and the balance of group discussion. Individual-level analysis further identified four latent profiles of individuals with distinct turn-taking styles: turn-receivers (i.e., receiving the floor assigned by the last speaker) (15%), turn-usurpers (20%) (usurping the floor when it was offered to another person), turn-claimers (10%) (claiming the floor when it was opened to the whole group) and turn-balancers (55%) (no strong turn-taking tendency). Individual participation rates and prior Chinese grades proved to be the two most significant unique predictors of individual membership in the turn-usurper profile. The findings suggest ensuring students' equitable access to the conversational floor and provide teachers with several specific turn-taking related approaches to promote equity and respect in peer talk.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 88
页数:26
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values
[2]   Examining the role of sentence openers, role assignment scaffolds and self-determination in collaborative knowledge building [J].
Avci, Ummuhan .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 68 (01) :109-135
[3]  
Bakhtin Mikhail., 1984, RABELAIS HIS WORLD
[4]   When smart groups fail [J].
Barron, B .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (03) :307-359
[5]   A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition [J].
Belland, Brian R. ;
Kim, ChanMin ;
Hannafin, Michael J. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2013, 48 (04) :243-270
[6]   EXCHANGE AND POWER IN SOCIAL-LIFE - BLAU,PM [J].
BIERSTEDT, R .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1965, 30 (05) :789-790
[7]  
Blatchford P., 2003, International Journal of Educational Research, V39, P153, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00078-8
[8]  
Blue AV, 1998, MED TEACH, V20, P217
[9]   Promoting 'relational equity' and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach [J].
Boaler, Jo .
BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2008, 34 (02) :167-194
[10]  
Borge M., 2014, P 18 INT C SUPPORTIN, P215