Do government subsidies stimulate firms' R&D efforts? Empirical evidence from China

被引:22
作者
Sun, Xiaohua [1 ]
Yu, Runqun [1 ]
Wang, Yun [1 ]
Colombage, Sisira R. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Room D308,2 Linggong Rd, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Federat Univ Australia, Sch Business, Gippsland, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Government subsidies; R&D decision; Heckman two-step model; state-owned firms; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; PUBLIC SUBSIDIES; INNOVATION; OWNERSHIP; IMPACT; PRODUCTIVITY; ENTERPRISES; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1080/19761597.2020.1719018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Government subsidies have been one of the popular policy instruments to stimulate firms' R&D activities. We empirically investigate the impact of government subsidies on firms' R&D decisions of listed manufacturing firms in China. In contrast to prior studies, we split firms' R&D decision into two elements of 'whether to invest decision' and 'how much to invest decision'. The influences and mechanism of government subsidies on R&D decision are theoretically analysed to develop hypotheses tested in this study. We find that government subsidies have a promotion effect on both elements of the firms' R&D decision. Moreover, we also demonstrate the heterogeneous effects of government subsidies between state-owned and non-state firms. Due to the inherent principal-agent problem of state-owned firms and soft budget constraint, subsidies can only increase the probability to undertake R&D activities but cannot stimulate further investment in R&D efforts. However, our results indicate that government subsidies take effects in both elements of R&D decision for non-state firms.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 180
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   The "Matthew effect" in R&D public subsidies: The Italian evidence [J].
Antonelli, Cristiano ;
Crespi, Francesco .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (08) :1523-1534
[2]   DOES PUBLIC CAPITAL CROWD OUT PRIVATE CAPITAL [J].
ASCHAUER, DA .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1989, 24 (02) :171-188
[3]  
Audretsch DB, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P630
[4]   Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance [J].
Berchicci, Luca .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (01) :117-127
[5]   China's R&D explosion-Analyzing productivity effects across ownership types and over time [J].
Boeing, Philipp ;
Mueller, Elisabeth ;
Sandner, Philipp .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (01) :159-176
[6]   Profits, R&D, and innovation-a model and a test [J].
Bogliacino, Francesco ;
Pianta, Mario .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2013, 22 (03) :649-678
[7]  
Busom I., 2000, ECON INNOV NEW TECH, V9, P111, DOI [10.1080/10438590000000006, DOI 10.1080/10438590000000006]
[8]   R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: evidence from Italian manufacturing data [J].
Carboni, Oliviero .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 25 (04) :419-439
[9]   The impact of public policies on innovation and imitation: The role of R&D technology in growth models [J].
Cheng, LK ;
Tao, ZG .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 40 (01) :187-207
[10]  
Christensen C., 2013, INNOVATORS DILEMMA N, V2nd, P23