Inhaled Methoxyflurane versus Intravenous Morphine for Severe Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: Subgroup Analysis of MEDITA, a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial

被引:12
|
作者
Voza, Antonio [1 ]
Ruggiano, Germana [2 ]
Serra, Sossio [3 ]
Carpinteri, Giuseppe [4 ]
Gangitano, Gianfilippo [5 ]
Intelligente, Fabio [1 ]
Bonafede, Elisabetta [6 ]
Sblendido, Antonella [7 ]
Farina, Alberto [7 ]
Soldi, Amedeo [7 ]
Fabbri, Andrea [8 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Humanitas Res Teaching Hosp, Emergency Dept, Milan, Italy
[2] Santa Maria Annunziata Hosp, Emergency Med Dept, Florence, Italy
[3] Maurizio Bufalini Hosp, Emergency Dept, Cesena, Italy
[4] Policlin G Rodolico Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Catania, Italy
[5] Infermi Hosp, Emergency Dept, Rimini, Italy
[6] Div Ecol Studio Spa, YGHEA, Bologna, Italy
[7] Mundipharma Pharmaceut Srl, Med Affairs Dept, Milan, Italy
[8] Morgagni Pierantoni Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Via C Forlanini 34, I-47100 Forli, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH | 2020年 / 13卷
关键词
acute pain; analgesic; emergency department; methoxyflurane; morphine; prehospital; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; ANALGESIA; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S240911
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Opioid analgesics remain the cornerstone of treatment for severe trauma pain in the emergency setting, but there are barriers to their use. This post hoc analysis of a previously reported trial (MEDITA) investigated the efficacy and safety of low-dose methoxyflurane versus intravenous (IV) morphine for severe trauma pain. Patients and Methods: MEDITA was a Phase Mb, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study in Italian pre-hospital units and emergency departments (EudraCT: 2017-001565-25; NCT03585374). Adult patients (N=272) with moderate-to-severe trauma pain (score >= 4 on the Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]) were randomized 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane (3 mL) or standard analgesic treatment (SAT; IV paracetamol 1g or keto-profen 100mg for moderate pain [NRS 4-6] and IV morphine 0.1mg/kg for severe pain [NRS >= 7]). Analyses were performed for the severe pain subgroup. The primary efficacy variable was the overall change from baseline in visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity at 3, 5 and 10min post-randomization. Non-inferiority of methoxyflurane versus morphine was concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment difference was <1; superiority was concluded if the upper 95% CI was <0. Results: Ninety-three patients (methoxyflurane: 49; SAT: 44) were included in the severe pain intention-to-treat population. The reduction in VAS pain intensity over the first 10min was superior for methoxyflurane versus morphine (adjusted mean treatment difference: -5.54mm; 95% CI: -10.49, -0.59mm; p=0.029). Median time to onset of pain relief was 9min for methoxyflurane and 15min for morphine. Patients rated treatment efficacy and physicians rated treatment practicality "Excellent" or "Very good" for more methoxyflurane-treated patients (42.8% and 67.3%) than morphine-treated patients (18.1% and 22.8%). Adverse events, all non-serious, were reported in 20.4% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and in 4.8% of morphine-treated patients. Conclusion: Methoxyflurane provided superior short-term pain relief to IV morphine in patients with severe trauma pain and offers an effective non-narcotic treatment option.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 502
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison between lumbar and thoracic epidural morphine for severe isolated blunt chest wall trauma: a randomized open-label trial
    Hakim, Sameh Michel
    Latif, Fahmy S.
    Anis, Sherif G.
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2012, 26 (06) : 836 - 844
  • [22] Comparison of the Tolerability Profile of Controlled-Release Oral Morphine and Oxycodone for Cancer Pain Treatment. An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zecca, Ernesto
    Brunelli, Cinzia
    Bracchi, Paola
    Biancofiore, Giuseppe
    De Sangro, Carlo
    Bortolussi, Roberto
    Montanari, Luigi
    Maltoni, Marco
    Moro, Cecilia
    Colonna, Ugo
    Finco, Gabriele
    Roy, Maria Teresa
    Ferrari, Vittorio
    Alabiso, Oscar
    Rosti, Giovanni
    Kaasa, Stein
    Caraceni, Augusto
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (06) : 783 - +
  • [23] PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES); a protocol for two open-label randomised trials of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus routine care in the emergency department
    Smith, Jason E.
    Rockett, Mark
    Squire, Rosalyn
    Hayward, Christopher J.
    Creanor, Siobhan
    Ewings, Paul
    Barton, Andy
    Pritchard, Colin
    Benger, Jonathan Richard
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (02):
  • [24] Intravenous acetaminophen with morphine versus intravenous morphine alone for acute pain in the emergency room: protocol for a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study (ADAMOPA)
    Guillaume Cattin
    Joel Jenvrin
    Jean Benoit Hardouin
    Céline Longo
    Emmanuel Montassier
    Trials, 23
  • [25] Controlled Reperfusion Versus Conventional Treatment of the Acutely Ischemic Limb Results of a Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Trial
    Heilmann, Claudia
    Schmoor, Claudia
    Siepe, Matthias
    Schlensak, Christian
    Hoh, Andreas
    Fraedrich, Gustav
    Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (04) : 417 - 427
  • [26] Safety and efficacy of intravenous hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine in acute pancreatitis: An open-label, randomized controlled trial
    Chen, Zhiyao
    Jiang, Kun
    Liu, Fei
    Zhu, Ping
    Cai, Fei
    He, Yanqiu
    Jin, Tao
    Lin, Ziqi
    Li, Qian
    Hu, Cheng
    Tan, Qingyuan
    Yang, Xiaonan
    Guo, Jia
    Huang, Wei
    Deng, Lihui
    Xia, Qing
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [27] Comparison between lumbar and thoracic epidural morphine for severe isolated blunt chest wall trauma: a randomized open-label trial
    Sameh Michel Hakim
    Fahmy S. Latif
    Sherif G. Anis
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2012, 26 : 836 - 844
  • [28] Intravenous Amoxicillin Plus Intravenous Gentamicin for Children with Severe Pneumonia in Bangladesh: An Open-Label, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Controlled Trial
    Shahrin, Lubaba
    Chisti, Mohammod Jobayer
    Sarmin, Monira
    Rahman, Abu Sayem Mirza Md. Hasibur
    Shahid, Abu Sadat Mohammad Sayeem Bin
    Islam, Md. Zahidul
    Afroze, Farzana
    Huq, Sayeeda
    Ahmed, Tahmeed
    LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [29] Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
    Hirota, Morihisa
    Shimosegawa, Tooru
    Kitamura, Katsuya
    Takeda, Kazunori
    Takeyama, Yoshifumi
    Mayumi, Toshihiko
    Ito, Tetsuhide
    Takenaka, Mamoru
    Iwasaki, Eisuke
    Sawano, Hirotaka
    Ishida, Etsuji
    Miura, Shin
    Masamune, Atsushi
    Nakai, Yousuke
    Mitoro, Akira
    Maguchi, Hiroyuki
    Kimura, Kenji
    Sanuki, Tsuyoshi
    Ito, Tetsuya
    Haradome, Hiroki
    Kozaka, Kazuto
    Gabata, Toshifumi
    Kataoka, Keisho
    Hirota, Masahiko
    Isaji, Shuji
    Nakamura, Ryoji
    Yamagiwa, Koki
    Kayaba, Chie
    Ikeda, Koji
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 55 (03) : 342 - 352
  • [30] Transdermal buprenorphine patch versus oral celecoxib for pain management after total knee arthroplasty: An open-label, randomized controlled trial
    Xu, Xinxian
    Xie, Linghui
    Liu, Haixiao
    Hu, Yuezheng
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2020, 106 (05) : 915 - 919