Assessment of computer and information literacy in ICILS 2013: Do different item types measure the same construct?

被引:11
作者
Ihme, Jan Marten [1 ]
Senkbeil, Martin [1 ]
Goldhammer, Frank [2 ]
Gerick, Julia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Leibniz Inst Sci & Math Educ, Kiel, Germany
[2] German Inst Int Educ Res, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Univ Hamburg, Educ Sci, Hamburg, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL | 2017年 / 16卷 / 06期
关键词
ICILS; 2013; computer and information literacy; multiple choice items; performance tasks; simulation tasks; MULTIPLE-CHOICE; SELF-EFFICACY; DIGITALLY COMPETENT; INTERNET SKILLS; GENDER; STUDENTS; TESTS; ICT; SCHOOL; WEB;
D O I
10.1177/1474904117696095
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The combination of different item formats is found quite often in large scale assessments, and analyses on the dimensionality often indicate multi-dimensionality of tests regarding the task format. In ICILS 2013, three different item types (information-based response tasks, simulation tasks, and authoring tasks) were used to measure computer and information literacy in order to balance technological and information-related aspects of computer and information literacy. The item types differ in the cognitive processes and the type of knowledge they measure and in the strands and aspects of the ICILS 2013 framework they address. In this article, we explored which factor models that assume item type factors or type of knowledge factors fit the data. For the factors of the best fitting models, regression analyses on SES, frequency of computer use, self-efficacy, and gender were computed to work out the different meanings and the convergent and discriminant validity of the factors. The results show that three-dimensional models with correlated factors for item type or type of knowledge fit best. Regression analyses discover substantive implications of between-item and within-item models. The effects are discussed and an outlook is given.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 732
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Anderson L.W., 2001, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, Mplus user's guide
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, DIG TRANSF FRAM ICT
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, Social Consequences of Internet UseAccess, Involvement, and Interaction
  • [5] Bandura Albert, 1999, Self-efficacy, V13, P158, DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
  • [6] Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers
    Calvani, Antonio
    Fini, Antonio
    Ranieri, Maria
    Picci, Patrizia
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 58 (02) : 797 - 807
  • [7] Adolescents' computer performance: The role of self-concept and motivational aspects
    Christoph, Gabriela
    Goldhammer, Frank
    Zylka, Johannes
    Hartig, Johannes
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2015, 81 : 1 - 12
  • [8] COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY - DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE AND INITIAL TEST
    COMPEAU, DR
    HIGGINS, CA
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 1995, 19 (02) : 189 - 211
  • [9] INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF TESTS - ANALYSES OLD AND NEW
    CRONBACH, LJ
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1988, 53 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [10] Gender, networks, and cultural capital - Preface
    DiMaggio, P
    [J]. POETICS, 2004, 32 (02) : 99 - 103