Disparities in the Use of Adjuvant External Beam Radiation Therapy in Node-positive Cervical Cancer Patients Following Hysterectomy

被引:7
|
作者
Nasioudis, Dimitrios [1 ]
Musselman, Kelsey [2 ]
Gordhandas, Sushmita [2 ]
Chapman-Davis, Eloise [2 ]
Frey, Melissa K. [2 ]
Caputo, Thomas A. [2 ]
Holcomb, Kevin M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2020年 / 43卷 / 01期
关键词
cervical cancer; lymph node; radiation therapy; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; STAGE; MORTALITY; CARE; WOMEN; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; INSURANCE; DISTANCE; FACILITY;
D O I
10.1097/COC.0000000000000617
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the use of adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) among patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma metastatic to regional lymph nodes (LNs). Materials and Methods: The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were identified. Those with regional LN metastases who had a hysterectomy were selected and administration of adjuvant EBRT was evaluated. Travel distance from the reporting facility was categorized into short (<12.5 miles), intermediate (12.5 to 49.9 miles) and long (>49.9 miles). Results: A total of 3436 patients met the inclusion criteria; the rate of EBRT use was 69.7%. Black women were less likely to receive EBRT compared with white (64.2% vs. 70.6%, P=0.037), while patients who had radical hysterectomy were more likely to receive EBRT compared with those who had simple hysterectomy (72.6% vs. 66%, P<0.001). Rates of EBRT administration for patients who traveled short distance was 74.3% compared with 68.9% and 56.9% for those who traveled intermediate and long distance, respectively (P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients who traveled long (odds ratio: 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36, 0.54) or intermediate (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.86) distances were less likely to receive EBRT. After controlling for age, race, insurance, presence of comorbidities, stage, histology, and type of hysterectomy, omission of EBRT was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.32, 1.78). Conclusions: A large percentage of patients with early-stage cervical cancer and positive LNs did not receive EBRT following hysterectomy. Black women were less likely to receive EBRT than white women. Travel burden may negatively influence appropriate treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 46
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A postoperative scoring system for distant recurrence in node-positive cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection with para-aortic lymph node sampling or dissection
    Lee, Young-Jae
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    Lee, Shin-Wha
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    Suh, Dae-Shik
    Kim, Jong-Hyeok
    Kim, Yong-Man
    Kim, Young-Tak
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 144 (03) : 536 - 540
  • [32] Regional Nodal Radiation in Patients With Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer Reply
    Shah, Chirag
    Vicini, Frank
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (05): : 1547 - 1548
  • [33] Bladder cancer risk following primary and adjuvant external beam radiation for prostate cancer
    Chrouser, K
    Leibovich, B
    Bergstralh, E
    Zincke, H
    Blute, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (01) : 107 - 110
  • [34] Adjuvant external radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy for node-negative prostate cancer
    Davis, BJ
    Pisansky, TM
    Leibovich, BC
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2003, 13 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [35] The impact of boost radiation therapy after hysterectomy on cervical cancer patients with close or positive resection margins
    So Jung Lee
    Myungsoo Kim
    Yoo-Kang Kwak
    Hye Jin Kang
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2024, 26 : 689 - 697
  • [36] Dosimetric comparison of sequential intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and simultaneous integrated boost IMRT for lymph node-positive cervical cancer
    Mohanty, Samarpita
    Hajare, Raghavendra
    Gurram, Lavanya
    Aravindakshan, Dheera
    Midha, Vanisha
    Chopra, Supriya
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2023, 22
  • [37] Survival Benefits and Disparities in Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer
    Baig, Mirza Zain
    Filkins, Alexandra
    Khan, Muhammad
    Saif, Muhammad Wasif
    Aziz, Hassan
    JOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS, 2021, 22 (02): : 36 - 41
  • [38] Radiation therapy following mastectomy for axillary node-positive breast cancer: Indication of chest wall irradiation
    Ogawa, K
    Toita, T
    Kakinohana, Y
    Adachi, G
    Nishikuramori, Y
    Kamada, Y
    Miyaguni, T
    Shimabukuro, K
    Tamaki, N
    Murayama, S
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2000, 7 (05) : 1107 - 1112
  • [39] To Radiate or Not to Radiate? Adjuvant External Beam Radiation Therapy for Nonanaplastic Thyroid Cancer
    Arida, Abdul Karim
    Papaleontiou, Maria
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (07) : 732 - 733
  • [40] Bladder-preserving radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced and node-positive bladder cancer
    Carriere, Patrick
    Alhalabi, Omar
    Gao, Jianjun
    Mohamad, Osama
    Campbell, Matthew T.
    Shah, Amishi
    Goswami, Sangeeta
    Bree, Kelly
    Lee, Byron
    Navai, Neema
    Mok, Henry
    Mayo, Lauren
    Guo, Charles
    Nguyen, Quynh
    McGuire, Sean
    Park, Ryan
    Shah, Shalin
    Hoffman, Karen
    Frank, Steven
    Tang, Chad
    Choi, Seungtaek
    Kamat, Ashish
    Hassanzadeh, Comron
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 49